AMD Radeon HD 7970 versus NVIDIA Quadro 4000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon HD 7970 and NVIDIA Quadro 4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7970
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 1 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 118.4 GTexel / s versus 15.2 GTexel / s
- 8x plus de pipelines: 2048 versus 256
- 7.8x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,789 gflops versus 486.4 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 3 GB versus 2 GB
- 6.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 34541 versus 5013
- 6.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 84.413 versus 13.345
- 4.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1390.592 versus 306.122
- 4.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.336 versus 1.552
- 5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 101.929 versus 20.453
- 12.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 481.76 versus 39.651
- 4.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9448 versus 2079
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 versus 3472
- 4.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9448 versus 2079
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 versus 3472
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 22 December 2011 versus 2 November 2010 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 118.4 GTexel / s versus 15.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2048 versus 256 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,789 gflops versus 486.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 3 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 34541 versus 5013 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 84.413 versus 13.345 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1390.592 versus 306.122 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.336 versus 1.552 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 101.929 versus 20.453 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 481.76 versus 39.651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9448 versus 2079 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 versus 3472 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9448 versus 2079 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 versus 3472 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro 4000
- 2.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 142 Watt versus 300 Watt
- 2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 2808 MHz versus 1375 MHz
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 142 Watt versus 300 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2808 MHz versus 1375 MHz |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7970
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 4000
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon HD 7970 | NVIDIA Quadro 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 34541 | 5013 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 84.413 | 13.345 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1390.592 | 306.122 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.336 | 1.552 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 101.929 | 20.453 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 481.76 | 39.651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9448 | 2079 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 | 3472 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9448 | 2079 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 | 3472 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2276 | 0 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1476 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 382 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon HD 7970 | NVIDIA Quadro 4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
| Nom de code | Tahiti | GF100 |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
| Date de sortie | 22 December 2011 | 2 November 2010 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $549 | $1,199 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 464 | 1047 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Prix maintenant | $141.66 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.08 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 925 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,789 gflops | 486.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 256 |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 118.4 GTexel / s | 15.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 142 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4,313 million | 3,100 million |
| Vitesse du noyau | 475 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 274 mm | 241 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 3 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 264 GB/s | 89.9 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1375 MHz | 2808 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon HD 7970 avec des autres
AMDRadeon HD 7970 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9300 + nForce 730i
AMDRadeon HD 7970 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4870 X2
AMDRadeon HD 7970 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5165
AMDRadeon HD 7970 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7870 GHz Edition
AMDRadeon HD 7970 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980M
AMDRadeon HD 7970 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M395X
