NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M versus AMD Radeon HD 7970
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M and AMD Radeon HD 7970 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 22% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1127 MHz versus 925 MHz
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 300 Watt
- 2.7x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 3 GB
- Environ 82% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2500 MHz versus 1375 MHz
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 92.634 versus 84.413
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10572 versus 9448
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10572 versus 9448
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 October 2014 versus 22 December 2011 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1127 MHz versus 925 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 300 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 3 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2500 MHz versus 1375 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 92.634 versus 84.413 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10572 versus 9448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10572 versus 9448 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7970
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 118.4 GTexel / s versus 51.84 GTexel / s
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 2048 versus 1536
- 2.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,789 gflops versus 1,659 gflops
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 34541 versus 23826
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1390.592 versus 1146.534
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.336 versus 6.776
- 5.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 101.929 versus 18.431
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 481.76 versus 308.42
- 3.5x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2276 versus 649
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 118.4 GTexel / s versus 51.84 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2048 versus 1536 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,789 gflops versus 1,659 gflops |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 34541 versus 23826 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1390.592 versus 1146.534 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.336 versus 6.776 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 101.929 versus 18.431 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 481.76 versus 308.42 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 versus 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 versus 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 versus 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 versus 3342 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2276 versus 649 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7970
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M | AMD Radeon HD 7970 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7351 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 491 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 23826 | 34541 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 92.634 | 84.413 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1146.534 | 1390.592 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.776 | 7.336 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.431 | 101.929 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 308.42 | 481.76 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10572 | 9448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10572 | 9448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 | 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 649 | 2276 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M | AMD Radeon HD 7970 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GM204 | Tahiti |
| Date de sortie | 7 October 2014 | 22 December 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 462 | 464 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $549 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1127 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1038 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,659 gflops | 3,789 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 2048 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 51.84 GTexel / s | 118.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,200 million | 4,313 million |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | 1 | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | 1 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 2.1 x16 |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Longeur | 274 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 3 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 160 GB / s | 264 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2500 MHz | 1375 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4350
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5165
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7970
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7870 GHz Edition
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M395X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980M vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
