AMD Radeon R9 M395X versus AMD Radeon HD 7970
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 M395X and AMD Radeon HD 7970 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M395X
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 20% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 300 Watt
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 4 GB versus 3 GB
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 versus 22 December 2011 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 300 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 3 GB |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 versus 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 versus 3350 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7970
- Environ 28% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 118.4 GTexel / s versus 92.54 GTexel / s
- Environ 28% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,789 gflops versus 2,961 gflops
- Environ 10% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1375 MHz versus 1250 MHz
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 34541 versus 27734
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 84.413 versus 65.367
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1390.592 versus 799.421
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.336 versus 5.718
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 101.929 versus 71.057
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 481.76 versus 413.329
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9448 versus 7365
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 versus 2154
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9448 versus 7365
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 versus 2154
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 118.4 GTexel / s versus 92.54 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,789 gflops versus 2,961 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1375 MHz versus 1250 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 34541 versus 27734 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 84.413 versus 65.367 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1390.592 versus 799.421 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.336 versus 5.718 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 101.929 versus 71.057 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 481.76 versus 413.329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9448 versus 7365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 versus 2154 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9448 versus 7365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 versus 2154 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M395X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7970
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R9 M395X | AMD Radeon HD 7970 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5195 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 733 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 27734 | 34541 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.367 | 84.413 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.421 | 1390.592 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.718 | 7.336 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 71.057 | 101.929 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 413.329 | 481.76 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7365 | 9448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2154 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7365 | 9448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2154 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2276 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R9 M395X | AMD Radeon HD 7970 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Amethyst | Tahiti |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series |
| Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 | 22 December 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 461 | 464 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $549 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 723 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,961 gflops | 3,789 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 2048 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 92.54 GTexel / s | 118.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,000 million | 4,313 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 925 MHz | |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Eyefinity | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 2.1 x16 |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Longeur | 274 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 160.0 GB / s | 264 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1250 MHz | 1375 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| CrossFire | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R9 M395X avec des autres
AMDRadeon R9 M395X vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4350
AMDRadeon R9 M395X vs
AMDRadeon HD 7970
AMDRadeon R9 M395X vs
AMDRadeon HD 7870 GHz Edition
AMDRadeon R9 M395X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980M
AMDRadeon R9 M395X vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4170 Mobile
AMDRadeon R9 M395X vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
