AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM versus AMD Radeon HD 7570
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM and AMD Radeon HD 7570 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 35% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 875 MHz versus 650 MHz
- Environ 71% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 60 Watt
- Environ 13% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 1600 MHz
Date de sortie | 23 July 2013 versus 5 January 2012 |
Vitesse du noyau | 875 MHz versus 650 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 60 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1600 MHz |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7570
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 15.6 GTexel / s versus 7 GTexel / s
- 3x plus de pipelines: 480 versus 160
- 2.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 624 gflops versus 280.0 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 614 versus 263
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 256 versus 174
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 1550 versus 872
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.874 versus 2.021
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 259.769 versus 104.327
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.487 versus 0.239
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 14.033 versus 5.628
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 57.396 versus 23.365
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1389 versus 672
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2724 versus 1078
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 versus 2093
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1389 versus 672
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2724 versus 1078
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 versus 2093
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.6 GTexel / s versus 7 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 480 versus 160 |
Performance á point flottant | 624 gflops versus 280.0 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 614 versus 263 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 256 versus 174 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1550 versus 872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.874 versus 2.021 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 259.769 versus 104.327 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.487 versus 0.239 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.033 versus 5.628 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 57.396 versus 23.365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1389 versus 672 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2724 versus 1078 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 2093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1389 versus 672 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2724 versus 1078 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 2093 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 7570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 263 | 614 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 174 | 256 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 872 | 1550 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.021 | 4.874 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 104.327 | 259.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.239 | 0.487 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.628 | 14.033 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.365 | 57.396 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 672 | 1389 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1078 | 2724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2093 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 672 | 1389 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1078 | 2724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2093 | 3355 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 7570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | Caicos | Turks |
Date de sortie | 23 July 2013 | 5 January 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1541 | 1254 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 875 MHz | 650 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 280.0 gflops | 624 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 160 | 480 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 7 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 60 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 370 million | 716 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 168 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3, GDDR5 |