AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 6% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 875 MHz versus 823 MHz
- 3.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 130 Watt
| Date de sortie | 23 July 2013 versus 22 August 2012 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 875 MHz versus 823 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 130 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 85.25 GTexel / s versus 7 GTexel / s
- 7.2x plus de pipelines: 1152 versus 160
- 7.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,046 gflops versus 280.0 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 1536 MB versus 1 GB
- 3.1x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5600 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- 16.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 32.718 versus 2.021
- 9.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1021.371 versus 104.327
- 13.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.143 versus 0.239
- 10x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 56.509 versus 5.628
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 67.697 versus 23.365
- 8.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5983 versus 672
- 3.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3665 versus 1078
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3325 versus 2093
- 8.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5983 versus 672
- 3.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3665 versus 1078
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3325 versus 2093
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 85.25 GTexel / s versus 7 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1152 versus 160 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,046 gflops versus 280.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 1536 MB versus 1 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5600 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 32.718 versus 2.021 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1021.371 versus 104.327 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.143 versus 0.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 56.509 versus 5.628 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.697 versus 23.365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5983 versus 672 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3665 versus 1078 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 versus 2093 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5983 versus 672 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3665 versus 1078 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 versus 2093 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 263 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 174 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 872 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.021 | 32.718 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 104.327 | 1021.371 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.239 | 3.143 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.628 | 56.509 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.365 | 67.697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 672 | 5983 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1078 | 3665 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2093 | 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 672 | 5983 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1078 | 3665 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2093 | 3325 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Caicos | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 23 July 2013 | 22 August 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1541 | 811 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 875 MHz | 823 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 280.0 gflops | 2,046 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 160 | 1152 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 7 GTexel / s | 85.25 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 370 million | 3,540 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 888 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 168 mm | 241 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1536 MB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 134.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 5600 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM avec des autres
AMDRadeon HD 8490 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8600 GTS
AMDRadeon HD 8490 OEM vs
IntelGraphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
AMDRadeon HD 8490 OEM vs
AMDRadeon HD 6350
AMDRadeon HD 8490 OEM vs
AMDRadeon Sky 900
AMDRadeon HD 8490 OEM vs
AMDRadeon HD 8210
AMDRadeon HD 8490 OEM vs
AMDRadeon R4 Graphics
