AMD Radeon Pro W5700X versus AMD Radeon R9 390X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro W5700X and AMD Radeon R9 390X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
- Environ 77% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1855 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 277.9 GTexel/s versus 184.8 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 34% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 205 Watt versus 275 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
- 13.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16573 versus 11675
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16573 versus 11675
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1060 versus 820
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 17591 versus 9437
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 1855 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 277.9 GTexel/s versus 184.8 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt versus 275 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16573 versus 11675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16573 versus 11675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 versus 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 versus 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 versus 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 versus 3350 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 versus 820 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17591 versus 9437 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 390X
- Environ 10% de pipelines plus haut: 2816 versus 2560
Pipelines | 2816 versus 2560 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390X
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Pro W5700X | AMD Radeon R9 390X |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43810 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16573 | 11675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16573 | 11675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 | 3350 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 | 820 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17591 | 9437 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 114.288 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2911.861 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.947 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.411 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 683.568 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4242 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Pro W5700X | AMD Radeon R9 390X | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Nom de code | Navi 10 | Grenada |
Date de sortie | Q3'2020 | 18 June 2015 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 146 | 279 |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $429 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1855 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 40 | 44 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1243 MHz | |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.79 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.5 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 2816 |
Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 277.9 GTexel/s | 184.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 275 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10300 million | 6,200 million |
Performance á point flottant | 5,914 gflops | |
Stream Processors | 2816 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x Thunderbolt 3, 1x HDMI | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 12 inches (305 mm) | 275 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin |
Largeur | Dual-slot | |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 512 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |