AMD Radeon Pro W5700X versus AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro W5700X and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 277.9 GTexel/s versus 304.8 GT/s
- Environ 10% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 205 Watt versus 225 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16573 versus 14699
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16573 versus 14699
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1060 versus 922
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 17591 versus 16473
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 277.9 GTexel/s versus 304.8 GT/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt versus 225 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16573 versus 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16573 versus 14699 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 versus 922 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17591 versus 16473 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- Environ 29% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1605 MHz versus 1243 MHz
- Environ 3% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1905 MHz versus 1855 MHz
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 77256 versus 43810
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz versus 1243 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1905 MHz versus 1855 MHz |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 77256 versus 43810 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 versus 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 versus 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 versus 3364 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 versus 3364 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Pro W5700X | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43810 | 77256 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16573 | 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16573 | 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 | 3369 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 | 3369 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 | 922 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17591 | 16473 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9442 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Pro W5700X | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | RDNA |
Nom de code | Navi 10 | Navi 10 |
Date de sortie | Q3'2020 | 7 July 2019 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 157 | 154 |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $400 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1855 MHz | 1905 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 40 | 40 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1243 MHz | 1605 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.79 TFLOPS (2:1) | 19.51 TFLOPs |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.5 TFLOPS | 9.75 TFLOPs |
Pipelines | 2560 | |
Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | 121.9 GP/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 277.9 GTexel/s | 304.8 GT/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 225 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10300 million | 10.3 B |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Texture Units | 160 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x Thunderbolt 3, 1x HDMI | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 12 inches (305 mm) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | 600 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin |
Largeur | Dual-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |