AMD Radeon R5 Graphics versus AMD Radeon R7 M440
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R5 Graphics and AMD Radeon R7 M440 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 M440
- 5.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1021 MHz versus 200 MHz
- Environ 68% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 20.42 GTexel / s versus 12.13 GTexel / s
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 320 versus 256
- Environ 68% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 653.4 gflops versus 388.1 gflops
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5598 versus 2981
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1935 versus 966
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2067 versus 1363
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2537 versus 1915
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1935 versus 966
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2067 versus 1363
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2537 versus 1915
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1021 MHz versus 200 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 20.42 GTexel / s versus 12.13 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 320 versus 256 |
| Performance á point flottant | 653.4 gflops versus 388.1 gflops |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5598 versus 2981 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1935 versus 966 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2067 versus 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2537 versus 1915 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1935 versus 966 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2067 versus 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2537 versus 1915 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M440
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | AMD Radeon R7 M440 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2981 | 5598 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.331 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 119.568 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.543 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.649 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.459 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 966 | 1935 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1363 | 2067 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1915 | 2537 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 966 | 1935 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1363 | 2067 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1915 | 2537 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 897 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 170 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | AMD Radeon R7 M440 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Nom de code | Wani | Meso |
| Date de sortie | 31 May 2016 | 15 May 2016 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1551 | 1112 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 800 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 200 MHz | 1021 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 388.1 gflops | 653.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 256 | 320 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.13 GTexel / s | 20.42 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Compte de transistor | 2,410 million | 3,100 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Genre de mémoire | System Shared | DDR3 |
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 16 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R5 Graphics avec des autres
AMDRadeon R5 Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8300 GS
AMDRadeon R5 Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9600M GS
AMDRadeon R5 Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620
AMDRadeon R5 Graphics vs
AMDRadeon HD 8330E
AMDRadeon R5 Graphics vs
AMDRadeon HD 8280E
AMDRadeon R5 Graphics vs
IntelUHD Graphics 605
