AMD Radeon R5 Graphics versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R5 Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 8% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 12.13 GTexel / s versus 11.2 billion / sec
- 2.7x plus de pipelines: 256 versus 96
- Environ 44% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 388.1 gflops versus 268.8 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 49 Watt
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2905 versus 1550
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.166 versus 4.046
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 119.568 versus 83.907
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.543 versus 0.371
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.649 versus 6.791
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 42.459 versus 17.41
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 966 versus 614
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1363 versus 1162
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1915 versus 1683
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 966 versus 614
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1363 versus 1162
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1915 versus 1683
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2016 versus 15 May 2012 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.13 GTexel / s versus 11.2 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 256 versus 96 |
Performance á point flottant | 388.1 gflops versus 268.8 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 49 Watt |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2905 versus 1550 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.166 versus 4.046 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 119.568 versus 83.907 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.543 versus 0.371 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.649 versus 6.791 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.459 versus 17.41 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 966 versus 614 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1363 versus 1162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1915 versus 1683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 966 versus 614 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1363 versus 1162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1915 versus 1683 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
- 3.5x plus de vitesse du noyau: 700 MHz versus 200 MHz
Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz versus 200 MHz |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2905 | 1550 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.166 | 4.046 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 119.568 | 83.907 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.543 | 0.371 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.649 | 6.791 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.459 | 17.41 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 966 | 614 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1363 | 1162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1915 | 1683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 966 | 614 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1363 | 1162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1915 | 1683 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 377 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 159 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Fermi |
Nom de code | Wani | GF108 |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2016 | 15 May 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1555 | 1546 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $39.99 | |
Prix maintenant | $39.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 13.32 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 800 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 200 MHz | 700 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 388.1 gflops | 268.8 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 96 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.13 GTexel / s | 11.2 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 49 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,410 million | 585 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 96 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Hauteur | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
Genre de mémoire | System Shared | DDR3 |
RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1.8 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
CUDA |