AMD Radeon R5 Graphics versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R5 Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 256 versus 192
- Environ 27% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 388.1 gflops versus 306.0 gflops
- Environ 27% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 19 Watt
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2905 versus 2279
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.166 versus 4.418
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.543 versus 0.395
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.649 versus 8.158
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 42.459 versus 17.317
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 966 versus 895
- 4.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1363 versus 280
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1915 versus 519
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 966 versus 895
- 4.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1363 versus 280
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1915 versus 519
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2016 versus 29 September 2014 |
Pipelines | 256 versus 192 |
Performance á point flottant | 388.1 gflops versus 306.0 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 19 Watt |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2905 versus 2279 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.166 versus 4.418 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.543 versus 0.395 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.649 versus 8.158 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.459 versus 17.317 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 966 versus 895 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1363 versus 280 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1915 versus 519 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 966 versus 895 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1363 versus 280 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1915 versus 519 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
- 4x plus de vitesse du noyau: 797 MHz versus 200 MHz
- Environ 5% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 12.75 GTexel / s versus 12.13 GTexel / s
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 142.734 versus 119.568
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 797 MHz versus 200 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.75 GTexel / s versus 12.13 GTexel / s |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 142.734 versus 119.568 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2905 | 2279 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.166 | 4.418 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 119.568 | 142.734 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.543 | 0.395 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.649 | 8.158 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.459 | 17.317 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 966 | 895 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1363 | 280 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1915 | 519 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 966 | 895 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1363 | 280 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1915 | 519 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 611 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 199 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
Nom de code | Wani | GK208B |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2016 | 29 September 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1555 | 1588 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $49 | |
Prix maintenant | $54.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.44 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 800 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 200 MHz | 797 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 388.1 gflops | 306.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 192 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.13 GTexel / s | 12.75 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 19 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,410 million | |
Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x8 |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Hauteur | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
Genre de mémoire | System Shared | DDR3 / GDDR5 |
RAM maximale | 1 GB or 1 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 (DDR3) or 40 (GDDR5) | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 900 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA |