AMD Radeon R5 Graphics versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R5 Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 4 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 12.13 GTexel / s versus 5.9 billion / sec
- 5.3x plus de pipelines: 256 versus 48
- 3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 388.1 gflops versus 129.02 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2963 versus 1333
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.166 versus 3.237
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 119.568 versus 83.376
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.543 versus 0.26
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.649 versus 5.92
- 8.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 42.459 versus 4.992
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 966 versus 536
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 966 versus 536
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2016 versus 5 January 2011 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.13 GTexel / s versus 5.9 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 256 versus 48 |
Performance á point flottant | 388.1 gflops versus 129.02 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2963 versus 1333 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.166 versus 3.237 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 119.568 versus 83.376 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.543 versus 0.26 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.649 versus 5.92 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.459 versus 4.992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 966 versus 536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 966 versus 536 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
- 3.4x plus de vitesse du noyau: 672 MHz versus 200 MHz
- Environ 25% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 12 Watt versus 15 Watt
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1731 versus 1363
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2380 versus 1915
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1731 versus 1363
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2380 versus 1915
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 672 MHz versus 200 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt versus 15 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1731 versus 1363 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2380 versus 1915 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1731 versus 1363 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2380 versus 1915 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2963 | 1333 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.166 | 3.237 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 119.568 | 83.376 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.543 | 0.26 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.649 | 5.92 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.459 | 4.992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 966 | 536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1363 | 1731 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1915 | 2380 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 966 | 536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1363 | 1731 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1915 | 2380 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 283 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 75 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Fermi |
Nom de code | Wani | GF108 |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2016 | 5 January 2011 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1561 | 1564 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $59.99 | |
Prix maintenant | $59.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 7.54 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 800 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 200 MHz | 672 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 388.1 gflops | 129.02 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 48 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.13 GTexel / s | 5.9 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 12 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,410 million | 585 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 48 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
Genre de mémoire | System Shared | DDR3 |
RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 12.8 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 800 MHz | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers |