AMD Radeon R5 Graphics versus NVIDIA GeForce 410M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R5 Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce 410M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 4 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 12.13 GTexel / s versus 4.6 GTexel / s
- 5.3x plus de pipelines: 256 versus 48
- 3.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 388.1 gflops versus 110.4 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2973 versus 1032
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.166 versus 2.846
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 119.568 versus 86.519
- 6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 42.459 versus 7.048
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 966 versus 494
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1363 versus 1163
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1915 versus 1570
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 966 versus 494
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1363 versus 1163
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1915 versus 1570
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2016 versus 5 January 2011 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.13 GTexel / s versus 4.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 256 versus 48 |
Performance á point flottant | 388.1 gflops versus 110.4 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2973 versus 1032 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.166 versus 2.846 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 119.568 versus 86.519 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.459 versus 7.048 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 966 versus 494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1363 versus 1163 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1915 versus 1570 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 966 versus 494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1363 versus 1163 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1915 versus 1570 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 410M
- 5.8x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1150 MHz versus 200 MHz
- Environ 25% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 12 Watt versus 15 Watt
Vitesse du noyau | 1150 MHz versus 200 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt versus 15 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 410M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce 410M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2973 | 1032 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.166 | 2.846 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 119.568 | 86.519 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.543 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.649 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.459 | 7.048 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 966 | 494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1363 | 1163 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1915 | 1570 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 966 | 494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1363 | 1163 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1915 | 1570 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 256 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 127 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce 410M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | Wani | GF119 |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2016 | 5 January 2011 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1561 | 1563 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 800 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 200 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 388.1 gflops | 110.4 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 48 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.13 GTexel / s | 4.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 12 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,410 million | 292 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 48 | |
Gigaflops | 73 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI |
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Soutien de bus | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 1 |
Mémoire |
||
Genre de mémoire | System Shared | DDR3 |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 12.8 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
Power management | 8.0 |