AMD Radeon R7 360 versus AMD FirePro M5100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 360 and AMD FirePro M5100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 360
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 29% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1000 MHz versus 775 MHz
- Environ 63% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 50.4 GTexel / s versus 31 GTexel / s
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 768 versus 640
- Environ 63% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,613 gflops versus 992.0 gflops
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3106 versus 2103
- 2.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 16433 versus 6773
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 38.068 versus 22.202
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 819.203 versus 537.558
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.386 versus 2.245
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 58.285 versus 40.642
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 188.858 versus 108.052
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4799 versus 2926
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4147 versus 3713
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4799 versus 2926
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4147 versus 3713
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 June 2015 versus 16 October 2013 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz versus 775 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 50.4 GTexel / s versus 31 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 versus 640 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,613 gflops versus 992.0 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3106 versus 2103 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16433 versus 6773 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 38.068 versus 22.202 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 819.203 versus 537.558 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.386 versus 2.245 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.285 versus 40.642 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 188.858 versus 108.052 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4799 versus 2926 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4147 versus 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4799 versus 2926 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4147 versus 3713 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro M5100
- 4.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4500 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 800 versus 513
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 800 versus 513 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3356 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 360
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M5100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R7 360 | AMD FirePro M5100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3106 | 2103 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 513 | 800 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16433 | 6773 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 38.068 | 22.202 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 819.203 | 537.558 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.386 | 2.245 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.285 | 40.642 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 188.858 | 108.052 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4799 | 2926 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4147 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4799 | 2926 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4147 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1402 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R7 360 | AMD FirePro M5100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Tobago | Venus |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
| Date de sortie | 18 June 2015 | 16 October 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 645 | 647 |
| Prix maintenant | $146.65 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 29.24 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,613 gflops | 992.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
| Stream Processors | 768 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 50.4 GTexel / s | 31 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
| Compte de transistor | 2,080 million | 1,500 million |
| Vitesse du noyau | 725 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Longeur | 165 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 6-pin | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB/s | 72 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1050 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R7 360 avec des autres
AMDRadeon R7 360 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X2300
AMDRadeon R7 360 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3430
AMDRadeon R7 360 vs
AMDRadeon R7 260X
AMDRadeon R7 360 vs
AMDFirePro M5100
AMDRadeon R7 360 vs
AMDFirePro W5100
AMDRadeon R7 360 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
