NVIDIA Tesla M10 versus AMD Radeon R7 360
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Tesla M10 and AMD Radeon R7 360 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla M10
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 31% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1306 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 4x 52.24 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 50.4 GTexel / s
- 3.3x plus de pipelines: 4x 640 versus 768
- 4.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4x 1,672 gflops versus 1,613 gflops
- 16x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4x 8 GB versus 2 GB
- 5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5200 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.191 versus 38.068
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5204 versus 4799
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5204 versus 4799
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 May 2016 versus 18 June 2015 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1306 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 4x 52.24 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 50.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 4x 640 versus 768 |
| Performance á point flottant | 4x 1,672 gflops versus 1,613 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4x 8 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5200 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.191 versus 38.068 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5204 versus 4799 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5204 versus 4799 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 360
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 225 Watt
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3129 versus 2994
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 514 versus 395
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 16433 versus 10362
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 819.203 versus 814.192
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 58.285 versus 50.918
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 188.858 versus 180.026
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4147 versus 3693
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 versus 3306
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4147 versus 3693
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 3306
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 225 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3129 versus 2994 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 514 versus 395 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16433 versus 10362 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 819.203 versus 814.192 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.285 versus 50.918 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 188.858 versus 180.026 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4147 versus 3693 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3306 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4147 versus 3693 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3306 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M10
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 360
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Tesla M10 | AMD Radeon R7 360 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2994 | 3129 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 395 | 514 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10362 | 16433 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.191 | 38.068 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 814.192 | 819.203 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 50.918 | 58.285 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 180.026 | 188.858 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5204 | 4799 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3693 | 4147 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3306 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5204 | 4799 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3693 | 4147 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3306 | 3356 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.386 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1402 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Tesla M10 | AMD Radeon R7 360 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GM107 | Tobago |
| Date de sortie | 18 May 2016 | 18 June 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 636 | 637 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Prix maintenant | $146.65 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 29.24 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1306 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1033 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 4x 1,672 gflops | 1,613 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 4x 640 | 768 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 4x 52.24 GTexel / s billion / sec | 50.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 2,080 million |
| Stream Processors | 768 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | 165 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1 x 6-pin |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4x 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 4x 83.2 GB / s | 112 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 4x 128 Bit | 128 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5200 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Tesla M10 avec des autres
NVIDIATesla M10 vs
ATIRadeon X550
NVIDIATesla M10 vs
ATIFireGL V5600
NVIDIATesla M10 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M270DX
NVIDIATesla M10 vs
AMDRadeon R7 360
NVIDIATesla M10 vs
AMDRadeon R9 A375
NVIDIATesla M10 vs
NVIDIAT600 Mobile
