AMD Radeon R7 360 versus NVIDIA GeForce 945A
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 360 and NVIDIA GeForce 945A pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 360
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 79% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 50.4 GTexel / s versus 28.22 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 384
- Environ 79% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,613 gflops versus 903.2 gflops
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3140 versus 1852
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 38.068 versus 28.865
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 819.203 versus 381.898
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.386 versus 1.991
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 58.285 versus 30.793
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 188.858 versus 107.63
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 June 2015 versus 13 March 2015 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 50.4 GTexel / s versus 28.22 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 versus 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,613 gflops versus 903.2 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3140 versus 1852 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 38.068 versus 28.865 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 819.203 versus 381.898 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.386 versus 1.991 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.285 versus 30.793 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 188.858 versus 107.63 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 945A
- Environ 18% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1176 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 33 Watt versus 100 Watt
- Environ 71% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 716 versus 515
- 2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 32359 versus 16200
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1176 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt versus 100 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 716 versus 515 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 32359 versus 16200 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 360
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 945A
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R7 360 | NVIDIA GeForce 945A |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3140 | 1852 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 515 | 716 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16200 | 32359 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 38.068 | 28.865 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 819.203 | 381.898 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.386 | 1.991 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.285 | 30.793 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 188.858 | 107.63 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4799 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4147 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4799 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4147 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1402 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R7 360 | NVIDIA GeForce 945A | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | Tobago | GM108 |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
| Date de sortie | 18 June 2015 | 13 March 2015 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 601 | 602 |
| Prix maintenant | $146.65 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 29.24 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | 1176 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,613 gflops | 903.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
| Stream Processors | 768 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 50.4 GTexel / s | 28.22 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,080 million | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1072 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Longeur | 165 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB/s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 64 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1050 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
