AMD Radeon R7 M340 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 M340 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 M340
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 6% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1021 MHz versus 967 MHz
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5185 versus 4267
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.063 versus 10.872
- 5.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 74.38 versus 13.423
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 versus 9 January 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 943 MHz versus 941 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1021 MHz versus 967 MHz |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5185 versus 4267 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.063 versus 10.872 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 74.38 versus 13.423 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
- Environ 80% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 30.94 GTexel / s versus 17.16 GTexel / s
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 384 versus 320
- Environ 35% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 742.7 gflops versus 549.1 gflops
- 4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4012 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1330 versus 651
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 244 versus 152
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.67 versus 13.48
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 251.09 versus 164.511
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.144 versus 0.943
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2351 versus 1550
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3520 versus 1732
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3334 versus 1668
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2351 versus 1550
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3520 versus 1732
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3334 versus 1668
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 30.94 GTexel / s versus 17.16 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 320 |
| Performance á point flottant | 742.7 gflops versus 549.1 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4012 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1330 versus 651 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 244 versus 152 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.67 versus 13.48 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 251.09 versus 164.511 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.144 versus 0.943 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2351 versus 1550 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3520 versus 1732 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 versus 1668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2351 versus 1550 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3520 versus 1732 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 versus 1668 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M340
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R7 M340 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 651 | 1330 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 152 | 244 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5185 | 4267 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.48 | 15.67 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 164.511 | 251.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.943 | 1.144 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.063 | 10.872 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 74.38 | 13.423 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1550 | 2351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1732 | 3520 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1668 | 3334 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1550 | 2351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1732 | 3520 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1668 | 3334 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 461 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R7 M340 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Meso | GK107 |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
| Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 | 9 January 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1383 | 1141 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1021 MHz | 967 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 6 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 943 MHz | 941 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 549.1 gflops | 742.7 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 320 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 17.16 GTexel / s | 30.94 GTexel / s |
| Compte de transistor | 3,100 million | 1,270 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 API |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 64 GB / s | 64.19 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1000 MHz | 4012 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
