AMD Radeon R7 M360 versus AMD Radeon R5 M230
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 M360 and AMD Radeon R5 M230 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 M360
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 33% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1100 MHz versus 825 MHz
- Environ 32% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1125 MHz versus 855 MHz
- Environ 58% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 27 GTexel / s versus 17.1 GTexel / s
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 384 versus 320
- Environ 58% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 864.0 gflops versus 547.2 gflops
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 568 versus 416
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 148 versus 129
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5379 versus 4543
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.911 versus 8.593
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.927 versus 0.852
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 49.774 versus 49.196
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1384 versus 985
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2460 versus 2401
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1384 versus 985
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2460 versus 2401
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 versus 7 January 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1100 MHz versus 825 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1125 MHz versus 855 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 27 GTexel / s versus 17.1 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 320 |
| Performance á point flottant | 864.0 gflops versus 547.2 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 568 versus 416 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 148 versus 129 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5379 versus 4543 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.911 versus 8.593 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.927 versus 0.852 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.774 versus 49.196 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1384 versus 985 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2460 versus 2401 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1384 versus 985 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2460 versus 2401 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R5 M230
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 143.386 versus 141.079
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.789 versus 14.763
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1927 versus 1280
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1927 versus 1280
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.386 versus 141.079 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.789 versus 14.763 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1927 versus 1280 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1927 versus 1280 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M360
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M230
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R7 M360 | AMD Radeon R5 M230 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 568 | 416 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 148 | 129 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5379 | 4543 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.911 | 8.593 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 141.079 | 143.386 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.927 | 0.852 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.763 | 15.789 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.774 | 49.196 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1384 | 985 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1280 | 1927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2460 | 2401 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1384 | 985 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1280 | 1927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2460 | 2401 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R7 M360 | AMD Radeon R5 M230 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Meso | Jet |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | AMD Radeon R5 200 Series |
| Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 | 7 January 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1432 | 1434 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1125 MHz | 855 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 6 | 5 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1100 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 864.0 gflops | 547.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 320 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 27 GTexel / s | 17.1 GTexel / s |
| Compte de transistor | 3,100 million | 1,040 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | Not Listed |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 16 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 bit | 64 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| Enduro | ||
| Powerplay | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R7 M360 avec des autres
AMDRadeon R7 M360 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7050 + nForce 620i
AMDRadeon R7 M360 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4670
AMDRadeon R7 M360 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K1100M
AMDRadeon R7 M360 vs
AMDRadeon R5 M230
AMDRadeon R7 M360 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 810M
AMDRadeon R7 M360 vs
NVIDIAGRID M40
