AMD Radeon R7 M360 versus NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 M360 and NVIDIA Quadro K1100M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 M360
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 56% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1100 MHz versus 706 MHz
- Environ 20% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 27 GTexel / s versus 22.59 GTexel / s
- Environ 59% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 864.0 gflops versus 542.2 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4837 versus 3034
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.911 versus 8.649
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.927 versus 0.642
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 14.763 versus 11.732
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 49.774 versus 16.3
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1280 versus 861
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2460 versus 1443
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1280 versus 861
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2460 versus 1443
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 versus 23 July 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1100 MHz versus 706 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 27 GTexel / s versus 22.59 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 864.0 gflops versus 542.2 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4837 versus 3034 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.911 versus 8.649 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.927 versus 0.642 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.763 versus 11.732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.774 versus 16.3 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1280 versus 861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2460 versus 1443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1280 versus 861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2460 versus 1443 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
- 2.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 2800 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1088 versus 575
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 253 versus 148
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 174.555 versus 141.079
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1892 versus 1384
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1892 versus 1384
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2800 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1088 versus 575 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 versus 148 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 174.555 versus 141.079 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1892 versus 1384 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1892 versus 1384 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M360
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R7 M360 | NVIDIA Quadro K1100M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 575 | 1088 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 148 | 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4837 | 3034 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.911 | 8.649 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 141.079 | 174.555 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.927 | 0.642 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.763 | 11.732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.774 | 16.3 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1384 | 1892 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1280 | 861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2460 | 1443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1384 | 1892 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1280 | 861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2460 | 1443 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R7 M360 | NVIDIA Quadro K1100M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Meso | GK107 |
Conception | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 | 23 July 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1437 | 1440 |
Genre | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109.94 | |
Prix maintenant | $79 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.59 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1125 MHz | |
Unités de Compute | 6 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1100 MHz | 706 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 864.0 gflops | 542.2 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 27 GTexel / s | 22.59 GTexel / s |
Compte de transistor | 3,100 million | 1,270 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Shader Model | 5 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 44.8 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1000 MHz | 2800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Graphiques changeables | ||
ZeroCore | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |