AMD Radeon R7 M360 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 M360 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 M360
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 42% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1100 MHz versus 775 MHz
- Environ 20% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1125 MHz versus 938 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 27 GTexel / s versus 12.4 GTexel / s
- 4x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 96
- 3.6x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 864.0 gflops versus 240.0 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 581 versus 450
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 148 versus 119
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4769 versus 2612
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.911 versus 6.901
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.927 versus 0.587
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 14.763 versus 10.121
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 49.774 versus 22.755
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1384 versus 1047
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2460 versus 2035
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1384 versus 1047
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2460 versus 2035
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 versus 1 April 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1100 MHz versus 775 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1125 MHz versus 938 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 27 GTexel / s versus 12.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 versus 96 |
Performance á point flottant | 864.0 gflops versus 240.0 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 581 versus 450 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 148 versus 119 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4769 versus 2612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.911 versus 6.901 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.927 versus 0.587 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.763 versus 10.121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.774 versus 22.755 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1384 versus 1047 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2460 versus 2035 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1384 versus 1047 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2460 versus 2035 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
- Environ 60% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1600 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 146.913 versus 141.079
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2570 versus 1280
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2570 versus 1280
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 146.913 versus 141.079 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2570 versus 1280 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2570 versus 1280 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M360
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R7 M360 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 581 | 450 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 148 | 119 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4769 | 2612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.911 | 6.901 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 141.079 | 146.913 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.927 | 0.587 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.763 | 10.121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.774 | 22.755 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1384 | 1047 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1280 | 2570 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2460 | 2035 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1384 | 1047 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1280 | 2570 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2460 | 2035 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R7 M360 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | Meso | GF117 |
Conception | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 | 1 April 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1436 | 1438 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1125 MHz | 938 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 6 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1100 MHz | 775 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 864.0 gflops | 240.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 27 GTexel / s | 12.4 GTexel / s |
Compte de transistor | 3,100 million | 585 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 2560x1600 | |
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 2560x1600 | |
Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 API |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 bit | 64 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Graphiques changeables | ||
ZeroCore | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus |