AMD Radeon R9 M380 versus AMD Radeon HD 6790
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 M380 and AMD Radeon HD 6790 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M380
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 7% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 900 MHz versus 840 MHz
- Environ 43% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 48 GTexel / s versus 33.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 14% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,536 gflops versus 1,344.0 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2771 versus 1589
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 529 versus 366
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.701 versus 12.318
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.618 versus 1.234
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 48.878 versus 28.768
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 194.051 versus 121.423
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3688 versus 3127
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3688 versus 3127
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 versus 4 April 2011 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 900 MHz versus 840 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 48 GTexel / s versus 33.6 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,536 gflops versus 1,344.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2771 versus 1589 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 529 versus 366 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.701 versus 12.318 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.618 versus 1.234 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 48.878 versus 28.768 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 194.051 versus 121.423 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3688 versus 3127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3688 versus 3127 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6790
- Environ 4% de pipelines plus haut: 800 versus 768
- 2.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4200 MHz versus 1500 MHz
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 750.421 versus 546.907
- 6.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3534 versus 536
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 versus 2855
- 6.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3534 versus 536
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 versus 2855
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 800 versus 768 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4200 MHz versus 1500 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 750.421 versus 546.907 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3534 versus 536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 versus 2855 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3534 versus 536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 versus 2855 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M380
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6790
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R9 M380 | AMD Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2771 | 1589 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 529 | 366 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12565 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.701 | 12.318 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 546.907 | 750.421 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.618 | 1.234 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 48.878 | 28.768 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 194.051 | 121.423 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3688 | 3127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 536 | 3534 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2855 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3688 | 3127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 536 | 3534 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2855 | 3350 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R9 M380 | AMD Radeon HD 6790 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | Strato | Barts |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 | 4 April 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 863 | 866 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Prix maintenant | $64.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 39.40 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 900 MHz | 840 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,536 gflops | 1,344.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 800 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 48 GTexel / s | 33.6 GTexel / s |
| Compte de transistor | 2,080 million | 1,700 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Longeur | 198 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 96 GB / s | 134.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz | 4200 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R9 M380 avec des autres
AMDRadeon R9 M380 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1450
AMDRadeon R9 M380 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5850
AMDRadeon R9 M380 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6790
AMDRadeon R9 M380 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560
AMDRadeon R9 M380 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4000M
AMDRadeon R9 M380 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 810A
