AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- 780x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5460 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 720 versus 590
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.535 versus 22.384
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 336.811 versus 290.861
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 versus 18 February 2014 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5460 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 720 versus 590 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.535 versus 22.384 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 336.811 versus 290.861 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
- Environ 7% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 889 MHz versus 834 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 213 billion / sec versus 93.41 GTexel / s
- Environ 61% de pipelines plus haut: 2880 versus 1792
- Environ 89% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 5,645 gflops versus 2,989 gflops
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 6 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8951 versus 4911
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 27085 versus 23543
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 72.677 versus 56.272
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1293.474 versus 778.867
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.988 versus 5.051
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 889 MHz versus 834 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 213 billion / sec versus 93.41 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2880 versus 1792 |
| Performance á point flottant | 5,645 gflops versus 2,989 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 4 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8951 versus 4911 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 27085 versus 23543 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 72.677 versus 56.272 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1293.474 versus 778.867 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.988 versus 5.051 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 720 | 590 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4911 | 8951 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 23543 | 27085 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.272 | 72.677 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 778.867 | 1293.474 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.051 | 7.988 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.535 | 22.384 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 336.811 | 290.861 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8721 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3679 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8721 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3679 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3095 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Grenada | GK110B |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 | 18 February 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 447 | 448 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $999 | |
| Prix maintenant | $999.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.82 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 834 MHz | 889 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,989 gflops | 5,645 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 2880 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 93.41 GTexel / s | 213 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6,200 million | 7,080 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 980 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 2880 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | One 8-pin and one 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 174.7 GB / s | 336 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5460 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition avec des autres
AMDRadeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 560
AMDRadeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 440
AMDRadeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 530v
AMDRadeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
AMDRadeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs
AMDRadeon E6465
AMDRadeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
