AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) versus AMD Radeon RX 480
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) and AMD Radeon RX 480 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- 2.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 70 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 970.421 versus 769.541
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 76.881 versus 67.879
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1730 versus 966
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 8 August 2016 versus 29 June 2016 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 970.421 versus 769.541 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.881 versus 67.879 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1730 versus 966 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 480
- Environ 3% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1120 MHz versus 1090 MHz
- Environ 6% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1266 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 182.3 GTexel / s versus 67.2 GTexel / s
- 2.6x plus de pipelines: 2304 versus 896
- 2.6x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 5.8 TFLOPs versus 2.2 TFLOPs
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8578 versus 4101
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 774 versus 578
- 2.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 39538 versus 17592
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 103.851 versus 55
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.593 versus 4.656
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 597.772 versus 237.944
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11172 versus 6821
- 96.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11172 versus 115.4
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1120 MHz versus 1090 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1266 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 182.3 GTexel / s versus 67.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 versus 896 |
Performance á point flottant | 5.8 TFLOPs versus 2.2 TFLOPs |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8578 versus 4101 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 774 versus 578 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39538 versus 17592 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 103.851 versus 55 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.593 versus 4.656 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 597.772 versus 237.944 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11172 versus 6821 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11172 versus 115.4 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 480
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) | AMD Radeon RX 480 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4101 | 8578 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 578 | 774 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17592 | 39538 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55 | 103.851 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 970.421 | 769.541 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.656 | 7.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.881 | 67.879 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 237.944 | 597.772 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6821 | 11172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 115.4 | 11172 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1730 | 966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) | AMD Radeon RX 480 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Nom de code | Baffin | Ellesmere |
Conception | Radeon RX 400 Series | Radeon RX 400 Series |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | 4th Gen |
Date de sortie | 8 August 2016 | 29 June 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $86 | $229 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 540 | 360 |
Prix maintenant | $179.50 | $299.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 33.86 | 39.12 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 1266 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 14 | 36 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1090 MHz | 1120 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 2.2 TFLOPs | 5.8 TFLOPs |
GPU Power | 35-48 Watt | 110 Watt |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 2304 |
Stream Processors | 896 | 2304 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 67.2 GTexel / s | 182.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt | 150 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 5,700 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 170 mm | 241 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 400 Watt | 500 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien de bus | n / a | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 2.0 | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
Enduro | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
VR Ready |