AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) versus AMD FirePro W8100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) and AMD FirePro W8100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 12% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 926 MHz versus 824 MHz
- Environ 17% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 154.4 GTexel / s versus 131.8 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 83% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 220 Watt
- Environ 32% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 6600 MHz versus 5000 MHz
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7979 versus 7333
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 111.543 versus 93.339
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.511 versus 8.816
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 511.362 versus 440.107
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9983 versus 5494
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9983 versus 5494
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 4 August 2016 versus 23 June 2014 |
Vitesse du noyau | 926 MHz versus 824 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 154.4 GTexel / s versus 131.8 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 220 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6600 MHz versus 5000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7979 versus 7333 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 versus 93.339 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 versus 8.816 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 versus 440.107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 versus 5494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 versus 5494 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W8100
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 2560 versus 2048
- 861x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,219 gflops versus 4.9 TFLOPs
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 34705 versus 33724
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2333.922 versus 1817.005
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 112.45 versus 99.875
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3699 versus 2443
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 versus 1674
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3699 versus 2443
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 versus 1674
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 2560 versus 2048 |
Performance á point flottant | 4,219 gflops versus 4.9 TFLOPs |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 727 versus 724 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34705 versus 33724 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2333.922 versus 1817.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 112.45 versus 99.875 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 versus 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 versus 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 versus 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 versus 1674 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W8100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | AMD FirePro W8100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7979 | 7333 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 | 727 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33724 | 34705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 | 93.339 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 | 2333.922 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 | 8.816 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 | 112.45 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 | 440.107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 | 5494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2443 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1674 | 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 | 5494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2443 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1674 | 3349 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 835 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | AMD FirePro W8100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Nom de code | Ellesmere | Hawaii |
Conception | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Date de sortie | 4 August 2016 | 23 June 2014 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $179 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 395 | 396 |
Prix maintenant | $109.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 100.00 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1206 MHz | |
Unités de Compute | 32 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 926 MHz | 824 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 4.9 TFLOPs | 4,219 gflops |
GPU Power | 85-110 Watt | |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2560 |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 154.4 GTexel / s | 131.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 220 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 6,200 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compte DisplayPort | 4 | |
Sortie du composant vidéo HD | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm | 279 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Facteur de forme | Full Height / Full Length | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 211 GB/s | 320 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 512 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6600 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |