AMD Radeon Pro 575X versus AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro 575X and AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro 575X
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 7 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 140.3 GTexel/s versus 154.4 GTexel / s
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 35017 versus 33787
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11237 versus 9983
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11237 versus 9983
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3458 versus 2443
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3458 versus 2443
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 1674
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 1674
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 March 2019 versus 4 August 2016 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 140.3 GTexel/s versus 154.4 GTexel / s |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35017 versus 33787 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11237 versus 9983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11237 versus 9983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3458 versus 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3458 versus 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 1674 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 575X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Pro 575X | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35017 | 33787 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11237 | 9983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11237 | 9983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3458 | 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3458 | 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 1674 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7965 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 723 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 842 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Pro 575X | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Nom de code | Polaris 20 | Ellesmere |
Date de sortie | 18 March 2019 | 4 August 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 391 | 389 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Conception | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $179 | |
Prix maintenant | $109.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 100.00 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Unités de Compute | 32 | 32 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 280.6 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.489 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.489 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 35.07 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 140.3 GTexel/s | 154.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 120 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5700 million | 5,700 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 1206 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 926 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 4.9 TFLOPs | |
GPU Power | 85-110 Watt | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Longeur | 241 mm | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 217.6 GB/s | 211 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6600 MHz | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |