AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1206 MHz versus 1178 MHz
- Environ 42% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 154.4 GTexel / s versus 109 billion / sec
- Environ 23% de pipelines plus haut: 2048 versus 1664
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 23% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 148 Watt
- 942.9x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6600 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 33787 versus 28498
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 111.543 versus 105.107
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1817.005 versus 1225.96
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.511 versus 8.737
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.875 versus 35.714
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 511.362 versus 490.688
- 2.3x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 842 versus 369
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 4 August 2016 versus 19 September 2014 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1206 MHz versus 1178 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 154.4 GTexel / s versus 109 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 2048 versus 1664 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 148 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6600 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 33787 versus 28498 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 versus 105.107 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 versus 1225.96 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 versus 8.737 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 versus 35.714 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 versus 490.688 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 842 versus 369 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
- Environ 13% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1050 MHz versus 926 MHz
- 800x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,920 gflops versus 4.9 TFLOPs
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9640 versus 7965
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 766 versus 723
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11499 versus 9983
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 versus 2443
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 versus 1674
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11499 versus 9983
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 versus 2443
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 versus 1674
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1050 MHz versus 926 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,920 gflops versus 4.9 TFLOPs |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9640 versus 7965 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 versus 723 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11499 versus 9983 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 versus 2443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 versus 1674 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11499 versus 9983 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 versus 2443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 versus 1674 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7965 | 9640 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 723 | 766 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 33787 | 28498 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 | 105.107 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 | 1225.96 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 | 8.737 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 | 35.714 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 | 490.688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 | 11499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2443 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1674 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 | 11499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2443 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1674 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 842 | 369 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Ellesmere | GM204 |
| Conception | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
| Date de sortie | 4 August 2016 | 19 September 2014 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $179 | $329 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 389 | 371 |
| Prix maintenant | $109.99 | $407.76 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 100.00 | 28.59 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1206 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 32 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 926 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 4.9 TFLOPs | 3,920 gflops |
| GPU Power | 85-110 Watt | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 1664 |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 154.4 GTexel / s | 109 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 148 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 5,200 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1664 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 241 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | 500 Watt |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pins |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Options SLI | 4x | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 211 GB/s | 224 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6600 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
