AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) versus NVIDIA Tesla M10
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) and NVIDIA Tesla M10 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 88% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 225 Watt
- Environ 27% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 6600 MHz versus 5200 MHz
- 3.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 34450 versus 10046
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 111.543 versus 46.191
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1817.005 versus 814.192
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.875 versus 50.918
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 511.362 versus 180.026
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9983 versus 5204
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9983 versus 5204
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 4 August 2016 versus 18 May 2016 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 225 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6600 MHz versus 5200 MHz |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34450 versus 10046 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 versus 46.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 versus 814.192 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 versus 50.918 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 versus 180.026 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 versus 5204 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 versus 5204 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla M10
- Environ 12% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1033 MHz versus 926 MHz
- Environ 8% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1306 MHz versus 1206 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 4x 52.24 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 137.5 GTexel / s
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 4x 640 versus 2048
- 1364.9x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4x 1,672 gflops versus 4.9 TFLOPs
- 8x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4x 8 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3693 versus 2443
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3306 versus 1674
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3693 versus 2443
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3306 versus 1674
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1033 MHz versus 926 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1306 MHz versus 1206 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 4x 52.24 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 137.5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4x 640 versus 2048 |
Performance á point flottant | 4x 1,672 gflops versus 4.9 TFLOPs |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4x 8 GB versus 4 GB |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3693 versus 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3306 versus 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3693 versus 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3306 versus 1674 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M10
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) | NVIDIA Tesla M10 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34450 | 10046 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 | 46.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 | 814.192 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 | 50.918 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 | 180.026 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 | 5204 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2443 | 3693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1674 | 3306 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 | 5204 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2443 | 3693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1674 | 3306 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3696 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3172 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 410 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) | NVIDIA Tesla M10 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell |
Nom de code | Ellesmere | GM107 |
Conception | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Date de sortie | 4 August 2016 | 18 May 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $549.99 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 482 | 630 |
Prix maintenant | $109.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 91.95 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1206 MHz | 1306 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 32 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 926 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 4.9 TFLOPs | 4x 1,672 gflops |
GPU Power | 85-110 Watt | |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 4x 640 |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 137.5 GTexel / s | 4x 52.24 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 225 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 1,870 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Longeur | 267 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4x 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 211 GB/s | 4x 83.2 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 4x 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6600 MHz | 5200 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |