NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile versus AMD Radeon RX 480
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 480 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 41% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1575 MHz versus 1120 MHz
- Environ 41% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1785 MHz versus 1266 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 114.2 GTexel/s versus 182.3 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 60 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 14% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 8000 MHz versus 7000 MHz
- 3.4x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3319 versus 968
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 versus 29 June 2016 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1575 MHz versus 1120 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz versus 1266 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 114.2 GTexel/s versus 182.3 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz versus 7000 MHz |
Référence | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3319 versus 968 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 480
- 2.3x plus de pipelines: 2304 versus 1024
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8590 versus 7222
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 775 versus 437
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 39553 versus 38863
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11172 versus 9313
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 versus 3698
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11172 versus 9313
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 versus 3698
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 2304 versus 1024 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8590 versus 7222 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 775 versus 437 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39553 versus 38863 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11172 versus 9313 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 versus 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 versus 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11172 versus 9313 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 versus 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 versus 3353 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 480
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 480 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7222 | 8590 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 437 | 775 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38863 | 39553 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9313 | 11172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9313 | 11172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3361 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3319 | 968 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 103.851 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 769.541 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.593 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 67.879 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 597.772 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 480 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
Nom de code | TU117 | Ellesmere |
Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 | 29 June 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 364 | 362 |
Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Conception | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | |
Prix maintenant | $299.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 39.12 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz | 1266 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1575 MHz | 1120 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 114.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.311 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.656 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 57.12 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 114.2 GTexel/s | 182.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 150 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 5,700 million |
Unités de Compute | 36 | |
Performance á point flottant | 5.8 TFLOPs | |
GPU Power | 110 Watt | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Soutien de bus | n / a | |
Longeur | 241 mm | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 128.0 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
Enduro | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HD3D | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
ZeroCore |