AMD Radeon RX 480 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 480 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 480
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 7% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1266 MHz versus 1178 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 182.3 GTexel / s versus 72 billion / sec
- 2.3x plus de pipelines: 2304 versus 1024
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 1000x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8578 versus 6111
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 774 versus 673
- 2.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 39538 versus 18734
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 103.851 versus 73.733
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.593 versus 4.888
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 67.879 versus 35.338
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 597.772 versus 200.825
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11172 versus 7218
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 versus 3691
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 versus 3335
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11172 versus 7218
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 versus 3691
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 versus 3335
- 6x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 966 versus 162
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 29 June 2016 versus 22 January 2015 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1266 MHz versus 1178 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 182.3 GTexel / s versus 72 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2304 versus 1024 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8578 versus 6111 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 774 versus 673 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39538 versus 18734 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 103.851 versus 73.733 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.593 versus 4.888 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 67.879 versus 35.338 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 597.772 versus 200.825 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11172 versus 7218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 versus 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 versus 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11172 versus 7218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 versus 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 versus 3335 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 966 versus 162 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
- Environ 1% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1127 MHz versus 1120 MHz
- 416x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,413 gflops versus 5.8 TFLOPs
- Environ 25% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 792.44 versus 769.541
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1127 MHz versus 1120 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 2,413 gflops versus 5.8 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 792.44 versus 769.541 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 480
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 480 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8578 | 6111 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 774 | 673 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39538 | 18734 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 103.851 | 73.733 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 769.541 | 792.44 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.593 | 4.888 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 67.879 | 35.338 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 597.772 | 200.825 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11172 | 7218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11172 | 7218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3335 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 966 | 162 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 480 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Nom de code | Ellesmere | GM206 |
Conception | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Date de sortie | 29 June 2016 | 22 January 2015 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | $199 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 360 | 514 |
Prix maintenant | $299.99 | $229.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 39.12 | 34.63 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1266 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 36 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1120 MHz | 1127 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 5.8 TFLOPs | 2,413 gflops |
GPU Power | 110 Watt | |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 1024 |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 182.3 GTexel / s | 72 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 120 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 2,940 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 1024 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Soutien de bus | n / a | PCI Express 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | 400 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pins |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Options SLI | 2x | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | 112 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
Enduro | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HD3D | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
ZeroCore | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost |