AMD Radeon RX 550 versus AMD Radeon HD 7750
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 550 and AMD Radeon HD 7750 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 550
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 48% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1183 MHz versus 800 MHz
- Environ 48% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 37.86 GTexel / s versus 25.6 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 50% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 75 Watt
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 1 GB
- 6.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 1125 MHz
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2690 versus 1693
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 476 versus 427
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.507 versus 21.658
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 versus 566.052
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.064 versus 2.182
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.533 versus 37.143
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 140.911 versus 98.126
- 14.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4485 versus 305
- 14.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4485 versus 305
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 versus 15 February 2012 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1183 MHz versus 800 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 37.86 GTexel / s versus 25.6 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 75 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 1 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 1125 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 versus 1693 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 versus 427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 versus 21.658 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 versus 566.052 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 versus 2.182 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 versus 37.143 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 versus 98.126 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 versus 305 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 versus 305 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7750
- 682.7x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 819.2 gflops versus 1.2 TFLOPs
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1439 versus 940
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3295 versus 2158
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1439 versus 940
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3295 versus 2158
Caractéristiques | |
Performance á point flottant | 819.2 gflops versus 1.2 TFLOPs |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1439 versus 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3295 versus 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1439 versus 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3295 versus 2158 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 550
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7750
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 550 | AMD Radeon HD 7750 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 | 1693 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 | 427 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11610 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 | 21.658 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 | 566.052 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 | 2.182 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 | 37.143 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 | 98.126 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 | 305 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 940 | 1439 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2158 | 3295 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 | 305 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 940 | 1439 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2158 | 3295 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 127 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 550 | AMD Radeon HD 7750 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | Lexa | Cape Verde |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 15 February 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $79 | $109 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 876 | 1128 |
Prix maintenant | $75 | $149.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 59.51 | 14.41 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1183 MHz | 800 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1100 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 1.2 TFLOPs | 819.2 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 512 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 37.86 GTexel / s | 25.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,200 million | 1,500 million |
Stream Processors | 512 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | 168 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
CrossFire |