AMD Radeon RX 550 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 550 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 550
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 43% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1100 MHz versus 771 MHz
- Environ 48% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1183 MHz versus 797 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 122 Watt
- Environ 40% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 5000 MHz
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.507 versus 33.184
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 versus 1002.196
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 140.911 versus 126.579
- 38.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4485 versus 117
- 8.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 940 versus 108.2
- 18x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2158 versus 119.7
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 versus 8 November 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1100 MHz versus 771 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1183 MHz versus 797 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 122 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 5000 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 versus 33.184 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 versus 1002.196 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 versus 126.579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 versus 117 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 940 versus 108.2 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2158 versus 119.7 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 102.0 GTexel / s versus 37.86 GTexel / s
- 3x plus de pipelines: 1536 versus 512
- 2040x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,448 gflops versus 1.2 TFLOPs
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.261 versus 3.064
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 54.752 versus 52.533
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6912 versus 4485
- 7.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6710 versus 940
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6703 versus 2158
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 102.0 GTexel / s versus 37.86 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 versus 512 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,448 gflops versus 1.2 TFLOPs |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.261 versus 3.064 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 54.752 versus 52.533 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6912 versus 4485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6710 versus 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6703 versus 2158 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 550
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 550 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11610 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 | 33.184 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 | 1002.196 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 | 3.261 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 | 54.752 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 | 126.579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 | 6912 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 940 | 6710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2158 | 6703 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 | 117 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 940 | 108.2 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2158 | 119.7 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 127 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 550 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Lexa | GK104 |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 8 November 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $79 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 876 | 879 |
Prix maintenant | $75 | |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 59.51 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1183 MHz | 797 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1100 MHz | 771 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1.2 TFLOPs | 2,448 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 1536 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 37.86 GTexel / s | 102.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 122 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,200 million | 3,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB/s | 160.0 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |