AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT versus AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT and AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 6 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 224.6 GTexel/s versus 409.6 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 14 nm
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 300 Watt
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 13556 versus 13013
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 872 versus 742
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 207.909 versus 190.25
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 20.486 versus 17.789
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13621 versus 12980
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13621 versus 12980
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7676 versus 7074
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 21 Jan 2020 versus 27 June 2017 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 224.6 GTexel/s versus 409.6 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 300 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13556 versus 13013 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 872 versus 742 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.909 versus 190.25 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.486 versus 17.789 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13621 versus 12980 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13621 versus 12980 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7676 versus 7074 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
- Environ 22% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1382 MHz versus 1130 MHz
- Environ 3% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1600 MHz versus 1560 MHz
- Environ 78% de pipelines plus haut: 4096 versus 2304
- 2.7x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 26% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1890 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 75767 versus 64776
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3611.018 versus 3560.776
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 181.113 versus 148.938
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1373.944 versus 1111.648
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1382 MHz versus 1130 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1600 MHz versus 1560 MHz |
Pipelines | 4096 versus 2304 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 6 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1890 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 75767 versus 64776 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3611.018 versus 3560.776 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 181.113 versus 148.938 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1373.944 versus 1111.648 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13556 | 13013 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 872 | 742 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64776 | 75767 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.909 | 190.25 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3560.776 | 3611.018 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.486 | 17.789 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 148.938 | 181.113 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1111.648 | 1373.944 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13621 | 12980 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13621 | 12980 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7676 | 7074 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 5.0 |
Nom de code | Navi 10 XLE | Vega 10 |
Date de sortie | 21 Jan 2020 | 27 June 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $279 | $999 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 199 | 202 |
Genre | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $999.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.37 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 36 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1130 MHz | 1382 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 449.3 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.38 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.188 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 224.6 GTexel/s | 409.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 300 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10300 million | 12,500 million |
Performance á point flottant | 13,107 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compte DisplayPort | 3 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 10.5 inches (267 mm) | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Largeur | Dual-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 6 GB | 16 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 288.0 GB/s | 483.8 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | 2048 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 1890 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |