AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT versus AMD Radeon RX Vega
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT and AMD Radeon RX Vega pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 61% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1605 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 59% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1905 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16661 versus 12297
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 927 versus 882
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 77153 versus 67658
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 252.601 versus 205.048
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.769 versus 17.999
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 254.777 versus 215.55
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1322.129 versus 1291.445
- 7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14699 versus 2094
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 versus 2391
- 7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14699 versus 2094
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 versus 2391
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 versus 1 April 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1905 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16661 versus 12297 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 versus 882 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 77153 versus 67658 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 versus 205.048 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 versus 17.999 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 versus 215.55 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 versus 1291.445 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14699 versus 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 versus 2391 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14699 versus 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 versus 2391 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega
- Environ 1% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 307.2 GTexel / s versus 304.8 GT/s
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3992.429 versus 3949.565
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8455 versus 3369
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8455 versus 3369
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 307.2 GTexel / s versus 304.8 GT/s |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3992.429 versus 3949.565 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8455 versus 3369 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8455 versus 3369 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | AMD Radeon RX Vega |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16661 | 12297 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 | 882 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 77153 | 67658 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 | 205.048 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 | 3992.429 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 | 17.999 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 | 215.55 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 | 1291.445 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14699 | 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 2391 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 | 8455 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14699 | 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 2391 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 | 8455 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9483 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | AMD Radeon RX Vega | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA | GCN 1.3 |
Nom de code | Navi 10 | Greenland |
Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 | 1 April 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $400 | $599.99 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 147 | 238 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $409.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 38.94 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1905 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 40 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.51 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.75 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 121.9 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 304.8 GT/s | 307.2 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 160 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 225 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10.3 B | |
Performance á point flottant | 9,830 gflops | |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | |
Pipelines | 4096 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 512 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 2048 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |