AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT versus NVIDIA TITAN V
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT and NVIDIA TITAN V pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 34% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1605 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 31% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1905 MHz versus 1455 MHz
- Environ 11% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 225 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3949.565 versus 3583.136
- 12.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 254.777 versus 20.669
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 versus 7 December 2017 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1905 MHz versus 1455 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 921 versus 919 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 versus 3583.136 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 versus 20.669 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 versus 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 versus 3716 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA TITAN V
- Environ 53% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 465.6 GTexel / s versus 304.8 GT/s
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 12 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19673 versus 16357
- 2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 155548 versus 77476
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 270.561 versus 252.601
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 30.857 versus 24.769
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1504.373 versus 1322.129
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15401 versus 14699
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4193 versus 3369
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15401 versus 14699
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4193 versus 3369
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3565 versus 2134
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 465.6 GTexel / s versus 304.8 GT/s |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 8 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19673 versus 16357 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 155548 versus 77476 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.561 versus 252.601 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 30.857 versus 24.769 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1504.373 versus 1322.129 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15401 versus 14699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4193 versus 3369 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15401 versus 14699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4193 versus 3369 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3565 versus 2134 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN V
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | NVIDIA TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16357 | 19673 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 921 | 919 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 77476 | 155548 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 | 270.561 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 | 3583.136 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 | 30.857 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 | 20.669 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 | 1504.373 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14699 | 15401 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 | 4193 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14699 | 15401 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 | 4193 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2134 | 3565 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | NVIDIA TITAN V | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA | Volta |
| Nom de code | Navi 10 | GV100 |
| Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 | 7 December 2017 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $400 | $2,999 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 162 | 157 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1905 MHz | 1455 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 40 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.51 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.75 TFLOPs | |
| Débit de remplissage de pixels | 121.9 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Stream Processors | 2560 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 304.8 GT/s | 465.6 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 160 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 10.3 B | 21,100 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 14,899 gflops | |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | |
| Pipelines | 5120 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 652.8 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 3072 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1700 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
AMDRadeon Pro SSG
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
AMDRadeon PRO W6400
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
NVIDIARTX A2000 Embedded
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
AppleM1 Pro 14-core
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
AMDRadeon 760M
