AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

  • La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 10 mois plus tard
  • Environ 5% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1905 MHz versus 1815 MHz
  • Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16661 versus 16069
  • Environ 24% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 927 versus 750
  • Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 252.601 versus 226.447
  • 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 254.777 versus 118.544
  • Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1322.129 versus 1106.12
Caractéristiques
Date de sortie 7 July 2019 versus 13 August 2018
Vitesse augmenté 1905 MHz versus 1815 MHz
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark 16661 versus 16069
PassMark - G2D Mark 927 versus 750
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 252.601 versus 226.447
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 254.777 versus 118.544
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1322.129 versus 1106.12
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3720 versus 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3369 versus 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3720 versus 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3369 versus 3358

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

  • Environ 1% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1620 MHz versus 1605 MHz
  • Environ 13% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 200 Watt versus 225 Watt
  • Environ 36% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 105171 versus 77155
  • Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4161.764 versus 3949.565
  • Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 25.476 versus 24.769
  • Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19811 versus 14699
  • Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19811 versus 14699
  • Environ 13% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10685 versus 9486
Caractéristiques
Vitesse du noyau 1620 MHz versus 1605 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 200 Watt versus 225 Watt
Référence
Geekbench - OpenCL 105171 versus 77155
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4161.764 versus 3949.565
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 25.476 versus 24.769
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19811 versus 14699
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19811 versus 14699
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 10685 versus 9486

Comparer les références

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
16661
16069
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
927
750
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
77155
105171
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
252.601
226.447
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3949.565
4161.764
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
24.769
25.476
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
254.777
118.544
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1322.129
1106.12
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14699
19811
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3720
3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3369
3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14699
19811
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3720
3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3369
3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
9486
10685
Nom AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
PassMark - G3D Mark 16661 16069
PassMark - G2D Mark 927 750
Geekbench - OpenCL 77155 105171
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 252.601 226.447
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 3949.565 4161.764
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 24.769 25.476
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 254.777 118.544
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1322.129 1106.12
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 14699 19811
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3720 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3369 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 14699 19811
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3720 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3369 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 9486 10685

Comparer les caractéristiques

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Essentiel

Architecture RDNA Turing
Nom de code Navi 10 TU104
Date de sortie 7 July 2019 13 August 2018
Prix de sortie (MSRP) $400 $2,299
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance 148 154
Genre Desktop Workstation

Infos techniques

Vitesse augmenté 1905 MHz 1815 MHz
Unités de Compute 40
Vitesse du noyau 1605 MHz 1620 MHz
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 19.51 TFLOPs
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 9.75 TFLOPs
Pixel fill rate 121.9 GP/s
Render output units 64
Stream Processors 2560
Taux de remplissage de la texture 304.8 GT/s
Texture Units 160
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 225 Watt 200 Watt
Compte de transistor 10.3 B 13,600 million
Processus de fabrication 12 nm

Sorties et ports de vidéo

Soutien de DisplayPort
HDMI
Connecteurs d’écran 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences

Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) 600 Watt
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
Longeur 267 mm

Soutien API

DirectX 12 12.0 (12_1)
Vulkan
OpenGL 4.6

Mémoire

RAM maximale 8 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire 448 GB/s
Largeur du bus mémoire 256 bit
Genre de mémoire GDDR6
Vitesse de mémoire 14000 MHz

Technologies

4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support
TrueAudio
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
VR Ready