AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 5% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1905 MHz versus 1815 MHz
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16537 versus 15973
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 922 versus 727
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 252.601 versus 226.447
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 254.777 versus 118.544
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1322.129 versus 1106.12
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 versus 13 August 2018 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1905 MHz versus 1815 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16537 versus 15973 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 922 versus 727 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 versus 226.447 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 versus 118.544 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 versus 1106.12 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 versus 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 versus 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 versus 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 versus 3358 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
- Environ 1% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1620 MHz versus 1605 MHz
- Environ 13% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 200 Watt versus 225 Watt
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 105171 versus 77238
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4161.764 versus 3949.565
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 25.476 versus 24.769
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19811 versus 14699
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19811 versus 14699
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10685 versus 9470
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1620 MHz versus 1605 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt versus 225 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 105171 versus 77238 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4161.764 versus 3949.565 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 25.476 versus 24.769 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 versus 14699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 versus 14699 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10685 versus 9470 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16537 | 15973 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 922 | 727 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 77238 | 105171 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 | 226.447 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 | 4161.764 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 | 25.476 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 | 118.544 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 | 1106.12 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14699 | 19811 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14699 | 19811 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9470 | 10685 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA | Turing |
| Nom de code | Navi 10 | TU104 |
| Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $400 | $2,299 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 160 | 162 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1905 MHz | 1815 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 40 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.51 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.75 TFLOPs | |
| Pixel fill rate | 121.9 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Stream Processors | 2560 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 304.8 GT/s | |
| Texture Units | 160 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 200 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 10.3 B | 13,600 million |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
NVIDIARTX A2000 Embedded
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
NVIDIAL4
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
AppleM1 Pro 14-core
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
AMDRadeon 760M
