AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT und NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 10 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 5% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1905 MHz vs 1815 MHz
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16535 vs 15967
- Etwa 27% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 922 vs 727
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 252.601 vs 226.447
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 254.777 vs 118.544
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1322.129 vs 1106.12
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 7 July 2019 vs 13 August 2018 |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1905 MHz vs 1815 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16535 vs 15967 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 922 vs 727 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 vs 226.447 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 vs 118.544 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 vs 1106.12 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 vs 3358 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
- Etwa 1% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1620 MHz vs 1605 MHz
- Etwa 13% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 200 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Etwa 36% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 105171 vs 77231
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4161.764 vs 3949.565
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 25.476 vs 24.769
- Etwa 35% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19811 vs 14699
- Etwa 35% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19811 vs 14699
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10685 vs 9470
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1620 MHz vs 1605 MHz |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 105171 vs 77231 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4161.764 vs 3949.565 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 25.476 vs 24.769 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 vs 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 vs 14699 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10685 vs 9470 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16535 | 15967 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 922 | 727 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 77231 | 105171 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 | 226.447 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 | 4161.764 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 | 25.476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 | 118.544 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 | 1106.12 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14699 | 19811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14699 | 19811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9470 | 10685 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | RDNA | Turing |
Codename | Navi 10 | TU104 |
Startdatum | 7 July 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $400 | $2,299 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 160 | 162 |
Typ | Desktop | Workstation |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1905 MHz | 1815 MHz |
Berechnungseinheiten | 40 | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1605 MHz | 1620 MHz |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.51 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.75 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 121.9 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Texturfüllrate | 304.8 GT/s | |
Texture Units | 160 | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 225 Watt | 200 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 10.3 B | 13,600 million |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
Display-Anschlüsse | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Länge | 267 mm | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | |
Speicherbandbreite | 448 GB/s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 14000 MHz | |
Technologien |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |