AMD Radeon RX 5700 versus AMD Radeon RX Vega
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5700 and AMD Radeon RX Vega pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5700
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 47% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1465 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 44% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1725 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 25% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 180 Watt versus 225 Watt
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 14499 versus 12297
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 889 versus 882
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 209.509 versus 205.049
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.941 versus 18.022
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 250 versus 215.8
- 5.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11536 versus 2094
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3723 versus 2391
- 5.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11536 versus 2094
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3723 versus 2391
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 versus 1 April 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1465 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt versus 225 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14499 versus 12297 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 889 versus 882 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 versus 205.049 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 versus 18.022 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 versus 215.8 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 versus 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 versus 2391 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 versus 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 versus 2391 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega
- Environ 24% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 307.2 GTexel / s versus 248.4 GT/s
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 67658 versus 66234
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4007.96 versus 3686.851
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1292.989 versus 1036.448
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8455 versus 3366
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8455 versus 3366
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 307.2 GTexel / s versus 248.4 GT/s |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 67658 versus 66234 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4007.96 versus 3686.851 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1292.989 versus 1036.448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8455 versus 3366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8455 versus 3366 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | AMD Radeon RX Vega |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14499 | 12297 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 889 | 882 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66234 | 67658 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 | 205.049 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 | 4007.96 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 | 18.022 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 | 215.8 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 | 1292.989 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 | 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 2391 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 | 8455 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 | 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 2391 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 | 8455 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8500 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 5700 | AMD Radeon RX Vega | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA | GCN 1.3 |
Nom de code | Navi 10 | Greenland |
Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 | 1 April 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $350 | $599.99 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 177 | 238 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $409.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 38.94 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 36 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1465 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.9 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.95 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 110.4 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 248.4 GT/s | 307.2 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 225 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10.3 B | |
Performance á point flottant | 9,830 gflops | |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | |
Pipelines | 4096 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 512 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 2048 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |