AMD Radeon RX 5700 versus AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5700 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5700
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 17% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1465 MHz versus 1247 MHz
- Environ 12% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1725 MHz versus 1546 MHz
- Environ 64% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 180 Watt versus 295 Watt
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 14499 versus 14391
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 889 versus 800
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 209.509 versus 195.478
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3686.851 versus 2129.009
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.941 versus 14.889
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 250 versus 129.271
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8499 versus 7519
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 versus 7 August 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1465 MHz versus 1247 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz versus 1546 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt versus 295 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14499 versus 14391 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 889 versus 800 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 versus 195.478 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 versus 2129.009 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 versus 14.889 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 versus 129.271 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 versus 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 versus 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8499 versus 7519 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 395.80 GTexel/s versus 248.4 GT/s
- 3.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 204168 versus 66238
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1328.033 versus 1036.448
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14744 versus 11536
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14744 versus 11536
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 395.80 GTexel/s versus 248.4 GT/s |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 204168 versus 66238 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1328.033 versus 1036.448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14744 versus 11536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14744 versus 11536 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14499 | 14391 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 889 | 800 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66238 | 204168 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 | 195.478 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 | 2129.009 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 | 14.889 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 | 129.271 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 | 1328.033 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 | 14744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 | 14744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8499 | 7519 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 5700 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA | GCN 5.0 |
Nom de code | Navi 10 | Vega 10 |
Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 | 7 August 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $350 | $499 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 177 | 170 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Conception | Radeon RX Vega Series | |
Prix maintenant | $449.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 41.07 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz | 1546 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 36 | 64 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1465 MHz | 1247 MHz |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.9 TFLOPs | 26.7 TFLOPs |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.95 TFLOPs | 13.4 TFLOPs |
Pixel fill rate | 110.4 GP/s | 98.90 GP/s |
Render output units | 64 | 64 |
Stream Processors | 2304 | 4096 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 248.4 GT/s | 395.80 GTexel/s |
Texture Units | 144 | 256 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 295 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10.3 B | 12,500 million |
Performance á point flottant | 12.7 TFLOPs | |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 840 GFLOPs | |
Pipelines | 8192 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | 750 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 2x 8-pin |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 279 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Vulkan | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 483.8 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 2048 bit |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1890 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
ZeroCore |