AMD Radeon RX 5700 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon RX 5700 und AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 5700
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 11 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 17% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1465 MHz vs 1247 MHz
- Etwa 12% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1725 MHz vs 1546 MHz
- Etwa 64% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 180 Watt vs 295 Watt
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14499 vs 14391
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 889 vs 800
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 209.509 vs 195.478
- Etwa 73% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3686.851 vs 2129.009
- Etwa 47% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.941 vs 14.889
- Etwa 93% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 250 vs 129.271
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8499 vs 7519
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 7 July 2019 vs 7 August 2017 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1465 MHz vs 1247 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1725 MHz vs 1546 MHz |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 295 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14499 vs 14391 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 889 vs 800 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 vs 195.478 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 vs 2129.009 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 vs 14.889 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 vs 129.271 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 vs 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8499 vs 7519 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- 1593.4x mehr Texturfüllrate: 395.80 GTexel/s vs 248.4 GT/s
- 3.1x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 204168 vs 66238
- Etwa 28% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1328.033 vs 1036.448
- Etwa 28% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14744 vs 11536
- Etwa 28% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14744 vs 11536
Spezifikationen | |
Texturfüllrate | 395.80 GTexel/s vs 248.4 GT/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 204168 vs 66238 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1328.033 vs 1036.448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14744 vs 11536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14744 vs 11536 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14499 | 14391 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 889 | 800 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66238 | 204168 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 | 195.478 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 | 2129.009 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 | 14.889 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 | 129.271 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 | 1328.033 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 | 14744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 | 14744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8499 | 7519 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon RX 5700 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | RDNA | GCN 5.0 |
Codename | Navi 10 | Vega 10 |
Startdatum | 7 July 2019 | 7 August 2017 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $350 | $499 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 177 | 170 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | Radeon RX Vega Series | |
Jetzt kaufen | $449.99 | |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 41.07 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1725 MHz | 1546 MHz |
Berechnungseinheiten | 36 | 64 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1465 MHz | 1247 MHz |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.9 TFLOPs | 26.7 TFLOPs |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.95 TFLOPs | 13.4 TFLOPs |
Pixel fill rate | 110.4 GP/s | 98.90 GP/s |
Render output units | 64 | 64 |
Stream Processors | 2304 | 4096 |
Texturfüllrate | 248.4 GT/s | 395.80 GTexel/s |
Texture Units | 144 | 256 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 180 Watt | 295 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 10.3 B | 12,500 million |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 12.7 TFLOPs | |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 840 GFLOPs | |
Leitungssysteme | 8192 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
Dual-Link-DVI-Unterstützung | ||
VGA | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 600 Watt | 750 Watt |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 2x 8-pin |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Länge | 279 mm | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Vulkan | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 448 GB/s | 483.8 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 2048 bit |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1890 MHz | |
Technologien |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
ZeroCore |