AMD Radeon RX 5700 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5700 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5700
- Environ 9% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1725 MHz versus 1582 MHz
- Environ 39% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 180 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3686.851 versus 2621.94
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.941 versus 21.26
- 7.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 250 versus 34.491
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11536 versus 10550
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3723 versus 3698
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3366 versus 3343
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11536 versus 10550
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3723 versus 3698
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3366 versus 3343
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz versus 1582 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 versus 2621.94 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 versus 21.26 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 versus 34.491 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 versus 10550 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 versus 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 versus 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 versus 10550 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 versus 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 versus 3343 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 12 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 255.521 versus 209.509
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1376.357 versus 1036.448
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 8 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 255.521 versus 209.509 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1376.357 versus 1036.448 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14499 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 889 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 66238 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 | 255.521 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 | 2621.94 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 | 21.26 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 | 34.491 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 | 1376.357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 | 10550 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 | 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 | 10550 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 | 3343 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8499 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA | |
| Nom de code | Navi 10 | |
| Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $350 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 177 | 318 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz | 1582 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 36 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1465 MHz | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.9 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.95 TFLOPs | |
| Pixel fill rate | 110.4 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Stream Processors | 2304 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 248.4 GT/s | |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 10.3 B | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 3840 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | DisplayPort, HDMI | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | 600 Watt |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Hauteur | 4.4 in | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Longeur | 10.5 in | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 547.7 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 384 bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 5700 avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
AMDRadeon R9 295X2
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
IntelArc A730M
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
AppleM1 Ultra 48-core
