AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP versus AMD Radeon RX 580
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP and AMD Radeon RX 580 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 23% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 185 Watt
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1890.261 versus 1022.932
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.121 versus 9.235
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 149.333 versus 84.034
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 614.542 versus 607.721
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 15 October 2018 versus 18 April 2017 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 185 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1890.261 versus 1022.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.121 versus 9.235 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 149.333 versus 84.034 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 614.542 versus 607.721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 versus 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 versus 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 3349 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 580
- Environ 8% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1257 MHz versus 1168 MHz
- Environ 4% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1340 MHz versus 1284 MHz
- Environ 14% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 8000 MHz versus 7000 MHz
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8879 versus 7711
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 771 versus 662
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 42148 versus 34856
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 116.142 versus 115.237
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11281 versus 9258
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11281 versus 9258
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4360 versus 3782
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1257 MHz versus 1168 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1340 MHz versus 1284 MHz |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz versus 7000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8879 versus 7711 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 771 versus 662 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42148 versus 34856 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 116.142 versus 115.237 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11281 versus 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11281 versus 9258 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4360 versus 3782 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | AMD Radeon RX 580 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7711 | 8879 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 662 | 771 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34856 | 42148 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.237 | 116.142 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1890.261 | 1022.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.121 | 9.235 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 149.333 | 84.034 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 614.542 | 607.721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9258 | 11281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9258 | 11281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3349 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3782 | 4360 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | AMD Radeon RX 580 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Nom de code | Polaris 20 | Polaris 20 |
Date de sortie | 15 October 2018 | 18 April 2017 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 335 | 331 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | |
Prix maintenant | $169.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 76.21 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1284 MHz | 1340 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1168 MHz | 1257 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 185 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 5,700 million |
Unités de Compute | 36 | |
Performance á point flottant | 6.2 TFLOPs | |
Pipelines | 2304 | |
Pixel fill rate | 42.88 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 192.96 GTexel/s | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm | 241 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 8000 MHz |
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 256 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |