AMD Radeon RX 580 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 580 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 580
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 23% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1257 MHz versus 1020 MHz
- Environ 24% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1340 MHz versus 1085 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 192.96 GTexel/s versus 34.72 GTexel / s
- 4.5x plus de pipelines: 2304 versus 512
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 8x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 1 GB
- 1600x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8000 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s
- 2.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8827 versus 3337
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 767 versus 515
- 4.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 39028 versus 9306
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 116.142 versus 34.239
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1022.932 versus 639.427
- 3.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.235 versus 2.341
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 84.034 versus 32
- 8.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 607.721 versus 69.814
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11281 versus 4498
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11281 versus 4498
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 versus 18 February 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1257 MHz versus 1020 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1340 MHz versus 1085 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 192.96 GTexel/s versus 34.72 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 versus 512 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 1 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8827 versus 3337 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 767 versus 515 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39028 versus 9306 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 116.142 versus 34.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1022.932 versus 639.427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.235 versus 2.341 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 84.034 versus 32 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.721 versus 69.814 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11281 versus 4498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 versus 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11281 versus 4498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 versus 3346 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
- 179.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,111 gflops versus 6.2 TFLOPs
- 3.4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 55 Watt versus 185 Watt
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1050 versus 1005
| Caractéristiques | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,111 gflops versus 6.2 TFLOPs |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt versus 185 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 versus 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 versus 3695 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1050 versus 1005 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 580
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 580 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8827 | 3337 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 767 | 515 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39028 | 9306 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 116.142 | 34.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1022.932 | 639.427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.235 | 2.341 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 84.034 | 32 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.721 | 69.814 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11281 | 4498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11281 | 4498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3346 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1005 | 1050 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 580 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | Polaris 20 | GM107 |
| Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
| Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 18 February 2014 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | $119 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 341 | 724 |
| Prix maintenant | $169.99 | $150.99 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 76.21 | 27.54 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1340 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 36 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1257 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 6.2 TFLOPs | 1,111 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 512 |
| Pixel fill rate | 42.88 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 32 | |
| Stream Processors | 2304 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 192.96 GTexel/s | 34.72 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 185 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 1,870 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 512 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 95 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 241 mm | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 256 GB/s | 80 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz | 5.0 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 580 avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 580 vs
ATIFireMV 2260
AMDRadeon RX 580 vs
NVIDIAQuadro CX
AMDRadeon RX 580 vs
ATIFirePro 2450 Multi-View
AMDRadeon RX 580 vs
NVIDIAGRID K140Q
AMDRadeon RX 580 vs
AMDRadeon R9 290
AMDRadeon RX 580 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M5000
