AMD Radeon RX 6800 versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 6800 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 6800
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 18% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1700 MHz versus 1440 MHz
- Environ 19% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 2105 MHz versus 1770 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 22313 versus 18872
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 972 versus 791
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 126216 versus 74179
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 383.037 versus 153.677
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2280.457 versus 1534.582
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 16299 versus 13943
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 28 Oct 2020 versus 13 August 2018 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1700 MHz versus 1440 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 2105 MHz versus 1770 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 12 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22313 versus 18872 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 972 versus 791 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 126216 versus 74179 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.585 versus 41.461 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 383.037 versus 153.677 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2280.457 versus 1534.582 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 versus 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3373 versus 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 versus 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3373 versus 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 16299 versus 13943 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
- 7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 488.989 versus 432.118
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19571 versus 16162
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19571 versus 16162
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 488.989 versus 432.118 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19571 versus 16162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19571 versus 16162 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6800
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 6800 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22313 | 18872 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 972 | 791 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 126216 | 74179 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 432.118 | 488.989 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.585 | 41.461 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 383.037 | 153.677 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2280.457 | 1534.582 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16162 | 19571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3373 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16162 | 19571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3373 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 16299 | 13943 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5451.006 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Nom de code | Navi 21 | TU102 |
| Date de sortie | 28 Oct 2020 | 13 August 2018 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $579 | $6,299 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 75 | 111 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 2105 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 60 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1700 MHz | 1440 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1010 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 32.33 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.17 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3840 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 202.1 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 505.2 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 26800 million | 18,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Hauteur | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Largeur | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 16 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 512.0 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 6800 avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 6800 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
AMDRadeon RX 6800 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6800M
AMDRadeon RX 6800 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 6800 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6750 XT
AMDRadeon RX 6800 vs
NVIDIAL4
AMDRadeon RX 6800 vs
AMDRadeon RX 7700S
