AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 33% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1300 MHz versus 980 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 52 GTexel / s versus 15.68 GTexel / s
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 640 versus 384
- 2.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,664 gflops versus 752.6 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 4.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 10 Watt versus 45 Watt
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1633 versus 793
- 2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 373 versus 149
- 2.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 10258 versus 3866
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 29.977 versus 9.392
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 309.874 versus 157.479
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.177 versus 0.864
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.847 versus 16.101
- 3.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 167.399 versus 44.77
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2315 versus 1589
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2315 versus 1589
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 26 October 2017 versus 1 April 2013 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz versus 980 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52 GTexel / s versus 15.68 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 versus 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,664 gflops versus 752.6 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt versus 45 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1633 versus 793 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 373 versus 149 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10258 versus 3866 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.977 versus 9.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 309.874 versus 157.479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.177 versus 0.864 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.847 versus 16.101 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 167.399 versus 44.77 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2315 versus 1589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2315 versus 1589 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
- 2.7x plus de vitesse du noyau: 810 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 8x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 256 MB
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3235 versus 3162
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3235 versus 3162
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 256 MB |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3235 versus 3162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3235 versus 3162 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1633 | 793 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 373 | 149 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10258 | 3866 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.977 | 9.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 309.874 | 157.479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.177 | 0.864 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.847 | 16.101 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 167.399 | 44.77 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2315 | 1589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3162 | 3235 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 | 3339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2315 | 1589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3162 | 3235 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 | 3339 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 345 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Raven | GK107 |
Date de sortie | 26 October 2017 | 1 April 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 912 | 1301 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz | 980 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 810 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,664 gflops | 752.6 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52 GTexel / s | 15.68 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 45 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4,940 million | 1,270 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 256 MB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 12.8 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | DDR4 | DDR3 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1802 MHz | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus |