AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 versus AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 and AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- Environ 4% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1247 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 3% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1546 MHz versus 1500 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 395.80 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 8192 versus 4096
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 14391 versus 12844
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 800 versus 769
- 3.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 204168 versus 64683
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 195.478 versus 174.714
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1328.033 versus 1226.861
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14744 versus 13848
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 3680
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3336
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14744 versus 13848
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 3680
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3336
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1247 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1546 MHz versus 1500 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 395.80 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 8192 versus 4096 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14391 versus 12844 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 800 versus 769 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 204168 versus 64683 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.478 versus 174.714 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1328.033 versus 1226.861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14744 versus 13848 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14744 versus 13848 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3336 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
- 967.6x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 12,288 gflops versus 12.7 TFLOPs
- Environ 28% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 230 Watt versus 295 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3924.968 versus 2129.009
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.305 versus 14.889
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 175.219 versus 129.271
Caractéristiques | |
Performance á point flottant | 12,288 gflops versus 12.7 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt versus 295 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3924.968 versus 2129.009 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.305 versus 14.889 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 versus 129.271 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
GPU 2: AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14391 | 12844 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 800 | 769 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 204168 | 64683 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.478 | 174.714 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2129.009 | 3924.968 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.889 | 17.305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 129.271 | 175.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1328.033 | 1226.861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14744 | 13848 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14744 | 13848 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3336 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7520 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 5.0 |
Nom de code | Vega 10 | Vega 10 |
Conception | Radeon RX Vega Series | |
Date de sortie | 7 August 2017 | 10 July 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | $1,599 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 170 | 196 |
Prix maintenant | $449.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 41.07 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1546 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 64 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1247 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 12.7 TFLOPs | 12,288 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 840 GFLOPs | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.7 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.4 TFLOPs | |
Pipelines | 8192 | 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 98.90 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 4096 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 395.80 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 256 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 295 Watt | 230 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 12,500 million | 12,500 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 279 mm | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 483.8 GB/s | 483.8 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 2048 bit | 2048 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1890 MHz | 1890 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
ZeroCore |