AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 versus AMD Radeon RX Vega
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 and AMD Radeon RX Vega pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 25% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1247 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 29% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1546 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 395.80 GTexel/s versus 307.2 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 8192 versus 4096
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 14391 versus 12297
- 3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 204168 versus 67658
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1328.033 versus 1292.989
- 7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14744 versus 2094
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 2391
- 7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14744 versus 2094
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 2391
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 7 August 2017 versus 1 April 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1247 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1546 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 395.80 GTexel/s versus 307.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 8192 versus 4096 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14391 versus 12297 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 204168 versus 67658 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1328.033 versus 1292.989 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14744 versus 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 2391 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14744 versus 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 2391 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega
- 774x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 9,830 gflops versus 12.7 TFLOPs
- Environ 31% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 225 Watt versus 295 Watt
- Environ 6% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz versus 1890 MHz
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 882 versus 800
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 205.049 versus 195.478
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4007.96 versus 2129.009
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 18.022 versus 14.889
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.8 versus 129.271
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8455 versus 3358
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8455 versus 3358
Caractéristiques | |
Performance á point flottant | 9,830 gflops versus 12.7 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt versus 295 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz versus 1890 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 882 versus 800 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.049 versus 195.478 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4007.96 versus 2129.009 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.022 versus 14.889 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.8 versus 129.271 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8455 versus 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8455 versus 3358 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | AMD Radeon RX Vega |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14391 | 12297 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 800 | 882 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 204168 | 67658 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.478 | 205.049 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2129.009 | 4007.96 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.889 | 18.022 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 129.271 | 215.8 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1328.033 | 1292.989 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14744 | 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 2391 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 8455 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14744 | 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 2391 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 8455 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7520 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | AMD Radeon RX Vega | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 1.3 |
Nom de code | Vega 10 | Greenland |
Conception | Radeon RX Vega Series | |
Date de sortie | 7 August 2017 | 1 April 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | $599.99 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 170 | 238 |
Prix maintenant | $449.99 | $409.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 41.07 | 38.94 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1546 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 64 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1247 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 12.7 TFLOPs | 9,830 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 840 GFLOPs | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.7 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.4 TFLOPs | |
Pipelines | 8192 | 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 98.90 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 4096 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 395.80 GTexel/s | 307.2 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 256 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 295 Watt | 225 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 12,500 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 279 mm | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 483.8 GB/s | 512 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 2048 bit | 2048 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1890 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
ZeroCore |