NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile versus AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 1% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1560 MHz versus 1546 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- 2.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 110 Watt versus 295 Watt
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19529 versus 14744
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19529 versus 14744
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 versus 7 August 2017 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz versus 1546 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt versus 295 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19529 versus 14744 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19529 versus 14744 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- Environ 12% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1247 MHz versus 1110 MHz
- Environ 59% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 395.80 GTexel/s versus 249.6 GTexel/s
- 3.2x plus de pipelines: 8192 versus 2560
- Environ 8% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1890 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7519 versus 7438
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 798 versus 534
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 14277 versus 12294
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1247 MHz versus 1110 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 395.80 GTexel/s versus 249.6 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 8192 versus 2560 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1890 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7519 versus 7438 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 798 versus 534 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14277 versus 12294 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3356 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7438 | 7519 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 534 | 798 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12294 | 14277 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19529 | 14744 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19529 | 14744 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3358 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 204168 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.478 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2129.009 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.889 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 129.271 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1328.033 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
| Nom de code | TU104 | Vega 10 |
| Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 | 7 August 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 183 | 181 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Conception | Radeon RX Vega Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | |
| Prix maintenant | $449.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 41.07 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz | 1546 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1110 MHz | 1247 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:32) | 840 GFLOPs |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS (2:1) | 26.7 TFLOPs |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | 13.4 TFLOPs |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 8192 |
| Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | 98.90 GP/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 249.6 GTexel/s | 395.80 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 295 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13600 million | 12,500 million |
| Unités de Compute | 64 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 12.7 TFLOPs | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Stream Processors | 4096 | |
| Texture Units | 256 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Largeur | IGP | |
| Longeur | 279 mm | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 483.8 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 2048 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 1890 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 295X2
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
NVIDIARTX A1000 Mobile
