AMD Radeon VII versus AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon VII and AMD Radeon R9 FURY X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon VII
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 67% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1750 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 61% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 432.24 GT/s versus 268.8 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 28 nm
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 90% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16693 versus 10015
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 206.353 versus 155.307
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4659.199 versus 3431.249
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.606 versus 12.49
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11724 versus 8673
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11724 versus 8673
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 9293 versus 5170
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 7 February 2019 versus 24 June 2015 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1750 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 432.24 GT/s versus 268.8 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 28 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 4 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16693 versus 10015 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 206.353 versus 155.307 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4659.199 versus 3431.249 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.606 versus 12.49 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11724 versus 8673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11724 versus 8673 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9293 versus 5170 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
- Environ 7% de pipelines plus haut: 4096 versus 3840
- Environ 9% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 275 Watt versus 300 Watt
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 843 versus 785
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.089 versus 69.256
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 857.575 versus 499.927
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8925 versus 3717
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8925 versus 3717
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 4096 versus 3840 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 275 Watt versus 300 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 843 versus 785 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.089 versus 69.256 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 857.575 versus 499.927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8925 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 versus 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8925 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 versus 3360 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon VII
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon VII | AMD Radeon R9 FURY X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16693 | 10015 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 785 | 843 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 89411 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 206.353 | 155.307 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4659.199 | 3431.249 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.606 | 12.49 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 69.256 | 153.089 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 499.927 | 857.575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11724 | 8673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 8925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11724 | 8673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 8925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3361 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9293 | 5170 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon VII | AMD Radeon R9 FURY X | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.1 | GCN 3.0 |
Nom de code | Vega 20 | Fiji |
Conception | AMD Radeon 2nd generation Vega | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series |
Génération GCN | 5th Gen | |
Date de sortie | 7 February 2019 | 24 June 2015 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | $649 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 215 | 220 |
Prix maintenant | $699.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 32.74 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1750 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 60 | 64 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1400 MHz | |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 3.46 TFLOPs | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 27.7 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.8 TFLOPs | |
Pipelines | 3840 | 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 115.26 GP/s | |
Stream Processors | 3840 | 4096 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 432.24 GT/s | 268.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 275 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13,230 million | 8,900 million |
Performance á point flottant | 8,602 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compte DisplayPort | 3 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 305 mm | 191 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 750 W | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Mémoire |
||
Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
RAM maximale | 16 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 1024 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 4096 Bit | 4096 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
ZeroCore | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR |