AMD Radeon Vega 11 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Vega 11 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Mémoire, Soutien API. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega 11
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 16 nm
- 3.4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 120 Watt
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.449 versus 31.946
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 versus 18 August 2016 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 120 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.449 versus 31.946 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 versus 3338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 versus 3338 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
- 5x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 31% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1708 MHz versus 1300 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 123.0 GTexel / s versus 57.2 GTexel / s
- Environ 64% de pipelines plus haut: 1152 versus 704
- 2.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,935 gflops versus 1,830 gflops
- 5.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9796 versus 1857
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 772 versus 478
- 2.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 32384 versus 13318
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 115.073 versus 41.582
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1325.07 versus 371.843
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.057 versus 3.156
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 425.709 versus 248.838
- 4.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10566 versus 2156
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3697 versus 2475
- 4.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10566 versus 2156
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3697 versus 2475
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1708 MHz versus 1300 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 123.0 GTexel / s versus 57.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1152 versus 704 |
Performance á point flottant | 3,935 gflops versus 1,830 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9796 versus 1857 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 772 versus 478 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32384 versus 13318 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.073 versus 41.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1325.07 versus 371.843 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.057 versus 3.156 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 425.709 versus 248.838 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10566 versus 2156 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3697 versus 2475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10566 versus 2156 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3697 versus 2475 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 11
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Vega 11 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1857 | 9796 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 478 | 772 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13318 | 32384 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.582 | 115.073 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 371.843 | 1325.07 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.156 | 8.057 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.449 | 31.946 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 248.838 | 425.709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2156 | 10566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2475 | 3697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2156 | 10566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2475 | 3697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3338 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 156 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Vega 11 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Pascal |
Nom de code | Owl | GP106 |
Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 | 18 August 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 886 | 388 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz | 1708 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,830 gflops | 3,935 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 704 | 1152 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 57.2 GTexel / s | 123.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 120 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4,940 million | 4,400 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
Longeur | 250 mm | |
Mémoire |
||
Genre de mémoire | System Shared | GDDR5 |
RAM maximale | 3 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.2 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
OpenGL | 4.6 |