AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 10x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8801 versus 6235
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.891 versus 18.456
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.104 versus 1.693
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.17 versus 27.232
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 132.07 versus 50.114
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6729 versus 3356
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6729 versus 3356
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 versus 20 February 2012 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 150 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8801 versus 6235 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.891 versus 18.456 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.104 versus 1.693 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.17 versus 27.232 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 132.07 versus 50.114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6729 versus 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6729 versus 3356 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
- 2.5x plus de vitesse du noyau: 736 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1914 versus 1583
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 423 versus 412
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 618.773 versus 365.4
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2970 versus 1514
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3114 versus 2433
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2970 versus 1514
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3114 versus 2433
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 736 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1914 versus 1583 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 423 versus 412 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 618.773 versus 365.4 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2970 versus 1514 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3114 versus 2433 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2970 versus 1514 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3114 versus 2433 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1583 | 1914 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 412 | 423 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8801 | 6235 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.891 | 18.456 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 365.4 | 618.773 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.104 | 1.693 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.17 | 27.232 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 132.07 | 50.114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1514 | 2970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2433 | 3114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6729 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1514 | 2970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2433 | 3114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6729 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 705 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Owl | GF114 |
| Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 | 20 February 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 965 | 967 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $89.99 | |
| Prix maintenant | $89.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 28.95 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 736 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4,940 million | 1,950 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 847.9 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 288 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 35.33 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Longeur | 210 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 91.87 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 3828 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded avec des autres
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Embedded vs
NVIDIAQuadro4 980 XGL
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Embedded vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3000
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Embedded vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 6100 + nForce Go 430
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Embedded vs
ATIRadeon HD 5730
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Embedded vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 SE
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Embedded vs
NVIDIAGeForce 840A
