AMD Radeon Vega 9 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Vega 9 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Soutien API, Mémoire, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega 9
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 576 versus 384
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 30 Watt
| Date de sortie | 26 Oct 2017 versus 17 May 2017 |
| Pipelines | 576 versus 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 30 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
- Environ 28% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1670 MHz versus 1300 MHz
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 445 versus 409
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2473 versus 1591
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3629 versus 2591
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3629 versus 2591
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 versus 1856
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 versus 1856
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3331 versus 2482
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3331 versus 2482
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1670 MHz versus 1300 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 445 versus 409 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2473 versus 1591 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3629 versus 2591 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3629 versus 2591 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 versus 1856 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 versus 1856 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 versus 2482 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 versus 2482 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 9
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Vega 9 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 409 | 445 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1591 | 2473 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9706 | 9706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2591 | 3629 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2591 | 3629 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1856 | 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1856 | 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2482 | 3331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2482 | 3331 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.898 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 170.785 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.373 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.937 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 160.823 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1083 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Vega 9 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Vega | Pascal |
| Nom de code | Vega Raven Ridge | N17P-G1 |
| Date de sortie | 26 Oct 2017 | 17 May 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 812 | 862 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $69.99 | |
| Prix maintenant | $59.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 63.91 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz | 1670 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 576 | 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4500 million | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1228 MHz | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12_1 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Mémoire partagé | Yes | 0 |
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Vega 9 avec des autres
AMDRadeon Vega 9 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6800 GT
AMDRadeon Vega 9 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
AMDRadeon Vega 9 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 11
AMDRadeon Vega 9 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645
AMDRadeon Vega 9 vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200
AMDRadeon Vega 9 vs
AMDRadeon RX 640
